Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)

28. I don't get this attitude

Reply to B Calm (Reply #27)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:41 PM

Jan 2016

If she had classified information on her server, I see no reason why that fact shouldn't be made public.

What's telling to me is that she repeatedly says that she didn't receive any information that was "marked classified". Why not just say that she didn't receive classified information?

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is Hil toast? [View all] trof Jan 2016 OP

ha ha. Every month she is accused of that and every month it is proved false riversedge Jan 2016 #1

Wasnt top secret when she received it though. Does that matter to folks who randys1 Jan 2016 #2

I disagree with most you say and think Hillary is a terrible Dem, but agree this is not a story. nt Logical Jan 2016 #4

What part of my liberal positions and statements do you disagree with? randys1 Jan 2016 #5

Think most of what you post is wrong. But no need to discuss. nt Logical Jan 2016 #9

The problem with this statement is that some information is born classified nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #6

Just curious Separation Jan 2016 #11

Part of the public release nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #16

And here is the reuters story nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #29

Exactly SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #24

One to me was screaming nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #30

Yep n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #31

ReTHUG insider in State malaise Jan 2016 #3

i doubt it -- I don't even know if it will have any impact at all karynnj Jan 2016 #7

"NOT PRIMARY!" alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #8

It would solve our problems RobertEarl Jan 2016 #10

"Is Hil toast?" Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #12

I'm not kidding, I thought the same thing! n/t Paper Roses Jan 2016 #15

Clevah. trof Jan 2016 #17

Seems to be in a bit of a jam. elias49 Jan 2016 #25

Only in the delusional dreams of her haters. n/t JTFrog Jan 2016 #13

Naw, she'll just buy the toaster and continue on. NV Whino Jan 2016 #14

Answer me this, grasshopper... kentuck Jan 2016 #18

Saying that they weren't classified when she received them SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #23

She has a huge lead in many states and Bernie has failed to capitalize LittleBlue Jan 2016 #19

OK, hold it. I do not hate Hillary. Did not, do not, will not. trof Jan 2016 #20

The fact that the "squeaky wheels" in this joint don't realize that many of us don't play their game ScreamingMeemie Jan 2016 #22

Well, there ARE a regiment or two's worth of skeletons hifiguy Jan 2016 #21

Any way to back this up? Links? trof Jan 2016 #26

Go to the state department and well, read the emails. nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #32

Just more BS! B Calm Jan 2016 #27

I don't get this attitude SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #28

The facts still remain the same, none of the emails were classified top secret when she received B Calm Jan 2016 #34

Well, yes, of course. NanceGreggs Jan 2016 #33

Locking. Sorry, but Host consensus is that this topic is in fact a 'Primary' topic, petronius Jan 2016 #35