Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anyone think Republicans are winning the Presidency? [View all]HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)8. See, that's the difference.
They successfully sold those candidates as moderates because there was either no internet or the American people didn't really know any better, they just saw the name "Bush" (that, and the Democrats just ran either weak opponents or, in Gore's case, horrible campaigns).
We're a lot more technologically involved and evolved. We can bring up a politician's past and damaging statements. There is no way any of these candidates can be sold as a moderate to have a broad appeal. America isn't the Sarah Palinized nation scared Democrats think it is.
I look at the GOP field and I don't see a single one that could seriously be president. Not ONE. They're all like Dan Quayle on steroids.
History practically fishes to find a good thing that happened during 43's reign of error. History is turning substantially on the Nixon and Reagan legacies. America realized they made a mistake with all three; mistakes so profound they aren't to be repeated.
We're a lot more technologically involved and evolved. We can bring up a politician's past and damaging statements. There is no way any of these candidates can be sold as a moderate to have a broad appeal. America isn't the Sarah Palinized nation scared Democrats think it is.
I look at the GOP field and I don't see a single one that could seriously be president. Not ONE. They're all like Dan Quayle on steroids.
History practically fishes to find a good thing that happened during 43's reign of error. History is turning substantially on the Nixon and Reagan legacies. America realized they made a mistake with all three; mistakes so profound they aren't to be repeated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I wasn't saying vox was 'the middle', I was saying the argument presented was an
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Feb 2016
#26
So wait, I have to only listen to your political scientists to know what the 'correct position'
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Feb 2016
#30
Only if the ' Third Way ' wins out or We elect a Dealer and not a leader. Do I think Trump will Win
orpupilofnature57
Feb 2016
#4
There's too much of a demographic spike for that now though. 17 year olds now are extremely left and
MillennialDem
Feb 2016
#18
I never said the end of the republican party - especially not at the state
MillennialDem
Feb 2016
#48
Rubio would probably beat Clinton, and anyone against except maybe Trump would beat Sanders.
Donald Ian Rankin
Feb 2016
#20
What makes you think Trump's supporters don't know he wants to be a dictator?
phantom power
Feb 2016
#31
Forget the candidates. Their winning is based on dark money and voter suppression.
kairos12
Feb 2016
#44
We are economic jolt, exploitable terrorist threat, or big Dem candidate mistake away from GOPER win
Hoyt
Feb 2016
#53
I'm of the opinion that it will be difficult for the Republicans to nominate a successful candidate
Proud Liberal Dem
Feb 2016
#62
At the end of a two term Democratic President, Republicans have an advantage.
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2016
#82