Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

skip fox

(19,502 posts)
5. Bil-O is saying:
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:45 PM
Feb 2016

"And since we know how Scalia would have voted on all the cases before the court presently, the logical next step would be to allow those cases to be voted on by the surviving members and then accept Scalia's intended vote. . . . In fact, since we know how he would have voted on nearly everything, and realizing he should have lived at least another 20 years, why . . ."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Jesus and me? We go...»Reply #5