Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]sibelian
(7,804 posts)50. But I don't think it *is* info.
It's just...
Junk.
Reflexive labelling. Circular firing squads. People habitually reinforcing simplistic slogans and meaningless soundbites, politics-as-lol-cat. Dumb bingo cards collecting your opponents arguments instead of addressing them.
Huge sections of demographics slotting themselves into behaviour patterns that consist of nothing more than banging your head against a brick wall.
And it's good news for advertisers. They are much happier with people banging their heads against brick walls than going elsewhere. More views for the advert.
I wonder if someone did a study comparing the *breadth* of Internet penetration these days in comparison with the past if they would find that people have a far greater tendency these days to stick to one or two favourite sites than go exploring...
I know that I see the same ideas being repeated over and over again in the same quarters far more than I used to.
I think the Internet as a medium for the exchange or development of ideas may be drawing to a close...
New political paradigms are not favoured in media that focus on simplistic messages...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Im done with this HRC site anyway. I just got banned from AA group for no reason
litlbilly
Mar 2016
#3
Denying the existence of a reason is not the same as the non-existence of a reason.
LanternWaste
Mar 2016
#9
I know, im not in the least bit upset. this site is just falling in behind M$NBC and the rest
litlbilly
Mar 2016
#8
I dont do it much. Ive been lurking here since 07 and joined in 12, but only recently posted
litlbilly
Mar 2016
#29
the Oligarchs have been in charge for so long, its gonna take more than one election
litlbilly
Mar 2016
#35
I dont think that's the case. There is so much info on the internet it is where the future is.
litlbilly
Mar 2016
#41
Maybe truly spectacular "tee hee, I dare you to ban me" threads should have special effects.
sibelian
Mar 2016
#25