Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NutmegYankee

(16,479 posts)
18. There have always been large numbers of Democrats who are "pro-gun".
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:31 PM
Apr 2016

It's a key reason the admins have never banned them. Guns are an urban/rural culture war item that is one of the unusual positions taken by some left leaning people - normally the party of the left supports strengthening individual liberty over the demands of social order, which tended to serve religious or moral viewpoints. Leaving guns in the hands of the common people is a classic leftwing political theory - power to the people. Stripping them from the common person and allowing only the wealthy and well connected to own guns is a classic rightwing political theory. There is a reason it was the Rightwing government in Australia that got their laws changed.

Guns have been associated with the rightwing in US politics in the last few decades only because the parties have aligned somewhat on the urban/rural divide and many rural people view the right to own guns as an example where the little people, otherwise powerless and exploited, are empowered and trusted by the government. Take away that trust and power, and they are just the poor worthless people that urban society ascribes to them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What about cars onecaliberal Apr 2016 #1
Exactly... Jnew28 Apr 2016 #2
But they would likely counter with... Jnew28 Apr 2016 #4
Weak tea argument, gun possession is protected in the constitution onecaliberal Apr 2016 #10
When did DU go pro gun? LisaM Apr 2016 #3
It's not pro-gun... Jnew28 Apr 2016 #6
Frankly, what will work? LisaM Apr 2016 #9
Sadly... Jnew28 Apr 2016 #15
Anti-Hillary is Pro-Gun. onehandle Apr 2016 #7
Hillary had the lowest point of her campaign by attacking Sanders for Sandy Hook. Jnew28 Apr 2016 #11
Lowest so far.... rgbecker Apr 2016 #20
That argument is full of shit. We're not pro gun and a senator with a D- rating from the NRA isn't onecaliberal Apr 2016 #14
There have always been large numbers of Democrats who are "pro-gun". NutmegYankee Apr 2016 #18
Excellent response. Jnew28 Apr 2016 #22
If you sell a product that is legal to sell, then is it defective? Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #5
Not if it's functioning in the intended manner. Jnew28 Apr 2016 #8
Then you can sue right now. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #13
Well, a person using illegally using a weapon isn't a product liability suit... Jnew28 Apr 2016 #16
Agreed - It Is Not Sensible To Hold The Manufacturer Responsible For Faulty Product Use cantbeserious Apr 2016 #12
I know - it's not a strong argument. n/t Jnew28 Apr 2016 #17
And kitchen carving knives! moondust Apr 2016 #19
They want to take advantage of every opportunity - it's sickening. Jnew28 Apr 2016 #21
We regulate and restrict sales of legal items all the time gratuitous Apr 2016 #23
Of course - but do we sue the manufacturers in the instance of human criminality? Jnew28 Apr 2016 #24
Locking after a review by forum hosts Omaha Steve Apr 2016 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My take on the "gun manuf...»Reply #18