Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
107. ...& his lawyer, Brendan Sullivan
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016


Ollie stared at Brooks and turned to whisper some question to his lawyer, Brendan Sullivan. Before they answered, Sen. Inouye, D-Hawaii, said questions like that were best answered in closed session. Here're a few more details, courtesy of Bartcop and ProRev:



News from Post-Constitutional America

PROGRESSIVE REVIEW, 1996 - The issue arose again during the Iran-Contra affair, but even in the wake of all the copy on that scandal, the public got little sense of how far some America's soldiers of fortune were willing to go to achieve their ends. When the Iran-Contra hearings came close to the matter, chair Senator Inouye backed swiftly away. Here is an excerpt from those hearings. Oliver North is at the witness table:

REP BROOKS: Colonel North, in your work at the NSC, were you not assigned, at one time, to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster?

BRENDAN SULLIVAN: Mr. Chairman?

SEN INOUYE: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and classified area so may I request that you not touch on that.

REP BROOKS: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in Miami papers, and several others, that there had been a plan developed by that same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution. And I was deeply concerned about it and wondered if that was the area in which he had worked. I believe that it was and I wanted to get his confirmation.

SEN INOUYE; May I most respectfully request that that matter not be touched upon at this stage. If we wish to get into this, I'm certain arrangements can be made for an executive session

With few exceptions, the media ignored what well could be the most startling revelation to have come out of the Iran/Contra affair, namely that high officials of the US government were planning a possible military/civilian coup. First among the exceptions was the Miami Herald, which on July 5, 1987, ran the story to which Jack Brooks referred. The article, by Alfonzo Chardy, revealed Oliver North's involvement in plans for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to take over federal, state and local functions during an ill-defined national emergency.

According to Chardy, the plan called for 'suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the government over to the Federal Management Agency, emergency appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of martial law.' The proposal appears to have forgotten that Congress, legislatures and the judiciary even existed.

CONTINUED...

http://prorev.com/coup.htm



Jack Brooks also was a leading light investigating the Inslaw-PROMIS affair.



A Primer on INSLAW

This primer has been collated and provided as a courtesy by Brian Wright. (Thank you.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpt from:
NEWS RELEASE
August 11, 1992
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary

Jack Brooks, Texas, Chairman

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE REPORT CALLS FOR INDEPENDENT COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE THE INSLAW CONTROVERSY

The ("INSLAW Affair&quot report concludes that there appears to be strong evidence, as indicated by the findings of two Federal court proceedings, as well as by the Committee investigation, that the Department of Justice "acted willfully and fraudulently," and "took, converted and stole," INSLAW's Enhanced PROMIS by "trickery, fraud and deceit." The report finds that these actions against INSLAW were implemented through the Project Manager from the beginning of the contract and under the direction of high-level Justice Department officials. The evidence presented in the report demonstrates that high-level Department officials deliberately ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights and misappropriated its PROMIS software for use at locations not covered under contract with the company. Justice then proceeded to challenge INSLAW's claims in court even though its own internal deliberations had concluded that these claims were valid and that the Department would most likely lose in court on this issue.

According to the report, the second phase of the Committee's investigation concentrated on the allegations that high-level officials at the Department of Justice conspired to drive INSLAW into insolvency and steal PROMIS. In this regard, the report states that several individuals testified under oath that INSLAW's PROMIS software was stolen and distributed internationally in order to provide financial gain to associates of Justice Department officials and to further intelligence and foreign policy objectives of the United States. Additional corroborating evidence was uncovered by the Committee which substantiated to varying degrees the information provided by these individuals.

(Chairman) Brooks stated, "Although (the Department of Justice was) faced with a growing body of evidence that serious wrongdoing had occurred which reached to the highest levels of the Department, both Attorney General Meese and Thornburgh ignored these findings of two Federal courts and refused to seek the appointment of an Independent Counsel."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpt from:

"Summer Of the Octopus"

WASHINGTON POST
by Mary McGrory
August 18, 1991


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Danny Casolaro) had been investigating the Inslaw case, a tangled affair of government perfidy and international intrigue that has been in litigation since 1983. In his explorations, he found out about possibly related scandals -- BCCI, S&Ls, Iran-contra, the "October surprise" -- but until two weeks ago, he had found nothing about Inslaw. Then, he joyfully told friends, he hit bingo. One more interview and the case was cracked.
Suicides do not tell their intimates within days of taking the hemlock that they are "ecstatic" or "euphoric." Casolaro did. Nor do they attend family birthday parties, as Danny Casolaro was planning to do hours before he died. The last known call was to his mother in Fairfax (VA). He told her he was on Interstate 81 in Pennsylvania. He would be late, but he was headed home. A manic-depressive might then kill himself. Nobody ever suggested Danny Casolaro was one.

Although the case involves the alleged theft of computer software by the Justice Department in the time of Ed Meese, Thornburgh took it to his bosom. Bill Hamilton, a perfectly nice midwesterner who owned a Washington firm called Inslaw, had invented Promis, a software especially adapted to crime statistics, which he sold to Justice. The second year, Justice stopped making payments. Hamilton and his wife, Nancy, believe that cronies of Meese were given the franchise to sell around the world. Promis has turned up in Canada and Pakistan. Thelink with the "October surprise" is Earl Brian, a former Reagan political associate who allegedly paid off Iranians to keep the hostages until after the 1980 election -- and allegedly was paid off himself with huge profits from Promis.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpt from:

"The Inslaw Octopus"

by Richard L. Fricker
WIRED

But the real power of PROMIS, according to Hamilton, is that with a staggering 570,000 lines of computer code, PROMIS can integrate innumerable databases without requiring any reprogramming. In essence, PROMIS can turn blind data into information. And anyone in government will tell you that information, when wielded with finesse, begets power. Converted to use by intelligence agencies, as has been alleged in interviews by ex-CIA and Israeli Mossad agents, PROMIS can be a powerful tracking device capable of monitoring intelligence operations, agents and targets, instead of legal cases.

Apparently, Israel was not the only country interested in using PROMIS for internal security purposes, Lt. Col. Oliver North also may have been using the program. According to several intelligence community sources, PROMIS was in use at a 6,100 square-foot command center built on the sixth floor of the Justice Department. According to both a contractor who helped design the center and information disclosed during the Iran-contra hearings, Oliver North had a similar, but smaller, White House operations room that was connected by computer link to the DOJ's command center,

Using the computers in the command center, North tracked dissidents and potential troublemakers within the United States as part of a domestic emergency preparedness program, commissioned under Reagan's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), according to sources and published reports. Using PROMIS, sources point out, North could have drawn up lists of anyone ever arrested for a political protest, for example, or anyone who had ever refused to pay their taxes. Compared to PROMIS, Richard Nixon's enemies lists or Sen. Joe McCarthy's blacklist look downright crude. The operation was so sensitive that when Rep. Jack Brooks asked North about it during the Iran-contra hearings, the hearing was immediately suspended pending an executive (secret) conference. When the hearings were reconvened, the issue of North's FEMA dealings was dropped.

Freelance reporter Danny Casolaro spent the last few years of his life investigating a pattern which he called "The Octopus." According to Casolaro, Inslaw was only part of a greater story of how intelligence agencies, the Department of Justice and even the mob had subverted the government and its various functions for their own profit.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpt from:

"The Dirtiest Bank of All"

by Jonathan Beaty and S.C. Gwynne
TIME
July 29, 1991

The more conventional departments of B.C.C.I. (Bank of Credit and Commerce International) handled such services as laundering money for the drug trade and helping dictators loot their national treasuries. The black network, which is still functioning, operates a lucrative arms-trade business and transports drugs and gold. According to investigators and participants in those operations, it often works with Western and Middle Eastern intelligence agencies. The strange and still murky ties between B.C.C.I. and the intelligence agencies of several countries are so pervasive that even the White House has become entangled. As TIME reported earlier this month, the National Security Council used B.C.C.I. to funnel money for the Iran-contra deals, and the CIA maintained accounts in B.C.C.I. for covert operations. Moreover, investigators have told TIME that the Defense Intelligence Agency has maintained a slush-fund account with B.C.C.I. apparently to pay for clandestine activities.
But the CIA may have used B.C.C.I. as more than an undercover banker: U.S. agents collaborated with the black network in several operations, according to a B.C.C.I. black-network "officer" who is now a secret U.S. government witness. Sources have told investigators that B.C.C.I. worked closely with Israel's spy agencies and other Western intelligence groups as well, especially in arms deals.

---a bookstore for democracy ---

http://www.copi.com/articles/inslaw_primer.htm



Mr. Brooks was a great man and a great Democrat. Like you are, deutsey!
It is a club, and you sure as hell are not part of it. But if you wanna feel really left Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #1
Nah I will vote for Hillary gabeana Mar 2016 #3
Impeached and jailed. But he wasnt because of that club you talk about, funny Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #8
Thats not me gabeana Mar 2016 #13
Because All Faith In Our System Would've Vanished billhicks76 Mar 2016 #75
It is a club and RW Dems like Lee Hamilton are just as much a part as Reagan. Perhaps more. leveymg Mar 2016 #65
Hamilton let Reagan off the hook then Dubya & Dick Cheney MinM Mar 2016 #73
Exactly. That's why he's the go-to guy for bipartisan whitewash. leveymg Mar 2016 #76
George H. Walker Bush and the 1980 “October Surprise” Mystery MinM Apr 2016 #93
Because Reagan went on television and confessed to trading arms for hostages Tony_FLADEM Mar 2016 #2
That's it gabeana Mar 2016 #5
That's how I preceive it. Tony_FLADEM Mar 2016 #12
My recollection is that he said he couldn't remember. jhart3333 Mar 2016 #70
Actually that was part of it Dan Mar 2016 #77
There was discussion even while he was in office kskiska Apr 2016 #94
So if I rob a bank and then admit it, can I get off too? Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #9
I didn't say I agreed with Reagan not being impeached for Iran Contra Tony_FLADEM Mar 2016 #14
"My heart and my best intentions still tell me that is true. But the facts and the evidence StevieM Mar 2016 #28
And Ollie North agreed to be the fall guy. uppityperson Mar 2016 #31
Oliver North sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #57
Except he didn't admit to any wrongdoing. Not really. yellowcanine Apr 2016 #102
No he didn't, he just said, "Good Gosh, I've just been informed ...." L. Coyote Mar 2016 #63
disarming to anyone who was a fucking gullipble idiot Skittles Mar 2016 #81
The Democrats were afraid to go after Saint Ronnie. At times Democrats can be craven. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #4
They knew what his mental capacity was and also knew and feared the BFEE behind the scenes. libtodeath Mar 2016 #6
Sorry don't know what BFEE means gabeana Mar 2016 #11
Bush Family Evil Empire grasswire Mar 2016 #16
Bush Family Evil Empire. libtodeath Mar 2016 #17
Cool I like it gabeana Mar 2016 #18
People nowadays only view Poppy Bush as the better Bush - he was pure evil and blm Mar 2016 #46
It's a family tradition dating back generations dflprincess Mar 2016 #72
Poppy was good at hiding his evil ways. PeoViejo Apr 2016 #101
The media was uncomfortable with it - they knew then he was showing signs of serious blm Mar 2016 #7
Precisely DemocracyDirect Mar 2016 #32
Pretty sure the governor was told to look the other way - blm Mar 2016 #43
Where did he get that nickname Poppy? DemocracyDirect Mar 2016 #51
Nope - opium drug trade. blm Mar 2016 #53
Care to explain? DemocracyDirect Mar 2016 #55
heheh...Poppy was CIA since the 60s. blm Mar 2016 #56
Oh I see. DemocracyDirect Mar 2016 #59
No, it was for turning America into a plutocracy. Rex Mar 2016 #79
Took this nation off its path of citizen democracy and put it on the road towards full-on fascism. blm Mar 2016 #92
I"ve often wondered why Mena is the one part of Clinton's past that the most rabid Repubs wouldn't Boomerproud Mar 2016 #47
**This** 4nic8em Mar 2016 #35
and I think IranContra is one of the reasons she hated GHWBush so much. blm Mar 2016 #44
His illness started way before that mdbl Mar 2016 #58
Because the investigations finished in 1987, and jeff47 Mar 2016 #10
At the time, one news correspondent opined that the U. S. populace "gave him a pass." John1956PA Mar 2016 #15
Mena Arkansas? Politicalboi Mar 2016 #19
Haven't you heard Chris Matthews talk about the good old days? dogman Mar 2016 #20
Reagan got more from a Democratic congress 1939 Mar 2016 #27
Got more? UtahJosh Mar 2016 #87
Two major income tax cuts specifically 1939 Mar 2016 #88
Ford's pardon of Nixon for Watergate set the precedent. muntrv Mar 2016 #21
No 24/7 media coverage or social media back then. grossproffit Mar 2016 #22
What I understand is they questioned him about it and he didn't know anything..this was shraby Mar 2016 #23
Plausible deniability oberliner Mar 2016 #24
Iran-Contra Hearings 1939 Mar 2016 #25
Did you miss the perjury? Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #30
Did they indict Poindexter for perjury? NT 1939 Mar 2016 #36
I thought one of the charges against North was perjury. Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #71
Years later George W. Bush gave Poindexter a job in the War on Terror after 9/11 StevieM Mar 2016 #34
Right. Poindexter made sure the trail (apparently) ended with him, unlike the Watergate hearings, Mc Mike Mar 2016 #37
Poindexter fell on his sword for Reagan 1939 Mar 2016 #38
Their entire party is a bunch of slimy, sneaky felons, apparently. Mc Mike Mar 2016 #45
By that time the old man was already failing and it was jwirr Mar 2016 #26
Years ago I heard a NPR interview with Lawrence Walsh, the Independent Counsel csziggy Mar 2016 #42
Short answer: Democrats too chickenshit. villager Mar 2016 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Mar 2016 #33
It may have been considered an unwinnable fight struggle4progress Mar 2016 #39
Because imbeciles believed his grandpa act that he "didn't know anything about it" tabasco Mar 2016 #40
Actually, He didn't matter much in the equation. PeoViejo Apr 2016 #106
His grandpa act put a friendly face on the mafia that was running the country. tabasco Apr 2016 #109
Remembering Lines PeoViejo Apr 2016 #110
Impeachment is something only Republicans focus on. liberal N proud Mar 2016 #41
Some links to read Solly Mack Mar 2016 #48
Because William Casey, the person that authorized the weapons for hostages... Lochloosa Mar 2016 #49
People that knew too much PeoViejo Apr 2016 #103
spell rtracey Mar 2016 #50
He was given a pass for being senile ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #52
Reagan was suffering from dementia. Bush Sr. was in all likelihood the real President. jalan48 Mar 2016 #54
Abetting after the fact. In a Just world many people of both parties JEB Mar 2016 #60
He and a lot of his cabinet used the now famous "I can't recall" defense under questioning.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2016 #61
Because they knew in advance to make sure he couldn't be. No one implicated him. L. Coyote Mar 2016 #62
When prosecutor Walsh (a Republican) realized how advanced Reagan's alzheimer's was he decided ... raindaddy Mar 2016 #64
Because then, as now, the dc dems are gutless appeasers. Every republican president since Nixon Doctor_J Mar 2016 #66
Adm. Poindexter and Plausible Deniability. WheelWalker Mar 2016 #67
Because the Democrtatic establishment did not want to. JHB Mar 2016 #68
Very disturbing gabeana Mar 2016 #80
IOKIYAR. pansypoo53219 Mar 2016 #69
In the nineties Dems did Thespian2 Mar 2016 #74
Can I mention a Joe Biden-chaired hearing in the 90s? Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2016 #83
Thanks Thespian2 Mar 2016 #86
He should have been HassleCat Mar 2016 #78
The Democratic Congress didn't exactly have much animosity towards Reagan. Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #82
Reagan DENIED KNOWING that the operation was going on, John Poet Mar 2016 #84
Open and shut case for high treason (which, not sorry Repubs, Iran-Contra very much was). HughBeaumont Mar 2016 #85
because the most powerful people in our government are NOT elected librechik Mar 2016 #89
they couldnt, everyone would have seen how far his dementia had progressed. Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #90
Reagan in PRISON or even just convicted and pardoned wasn't Hortensis Mar 2016 #91
Democrats didn't want to put the country thru it. hollowdweller Apr 2016 #95
Duane “Dewey” Clarridge, convicted of lying to Congress about Iran Contra MinM Apr 2016 #96
Maybe they didn't feel they had the evidence treestar Apr 2016 #97
Democrats always seem to fold like cheap tents. Vinca Apr 2016 #98
If Reagan had been a Democrat you better believe that the avebury Apr 2016 #99
Some Democrats love Dutch just as much as Republicans do Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #100
One big reason was Oliver North deutsey Apr 2016 #104
...& his lawyer, Brendan Sullivan Octafish Apr 2016 #107
George Herbert Walker Bush. Octafish Apr 2016 #105
because they were no b******* involved. nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #108
There's no industry profit in blowjobs LadyHawkAZ Apr 2016 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why was Reagan not impeac...»Reply #107