Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
31. I'm curious as to why you think she wrongfully fingered him on purpose?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:50 PM
Apr 2016

or that she had "fingered" him at all?

It was dark, she'd had too much to drink, she was having her face bashed in while being raped leaving her permanently blinded in one eye. Why do you imagine that she EVER could have gotten a good enough look at the perp going through all that? And when in her nightmares about the incident this innocent person's face appeared as the perp... she very well could have BELIEVED that was who it was. Acute trauma can do very fucked up things to peoples' minds.

What went wrong here was the police/DA's office. She TOLD people that one of three men could have been the perp. One of those three men she first named, Jackson, was questioned and TOLD investigators that the day of the attack he "had sex with her" and hit her. Then he later denied that. She did the right thing telling the police about who the man in her nightmares about the incident was. It wasn't HER fault if she believed that herself, or that she told the police that... it was the police/DA's office that ran with it, and wrongfully shaped the case around that while "losing" physical evidence, ignoring the fact that the innocent man convicted had a blood type that did NOT match that of the evidence (the DNA evidence wasn't part of the trial as there was no such thing at that time... it was introduced after the conviction, and a new trial was denied because the evidence was "lost&quot , and that the ACTUAL perp confessed to "having sex with her" and HITTING her THAT day.

The DA's office focused on the wrong man, even when the mostly likely one to have committed the crime was known. Imagining that it was her nightmare that was ALL of the evidence presented is ridiculous, and we don't know if she BELIEVED that she had fingered the right person or not, and I have no doubt that the police/DA's office did everything they possibly could to convince her that the man she saw in her nightmares was the perp, and of COURSE they would have put an expert on the stand swearing that what she recollected from her nightmares was what in FACT occurred.

This is hardly the first time a DA's office has gone after the "easier" suspect rather than the most likely one. It's par for the course, and once they get a conviction they AND judges are loath to admit they might have screwed up. They DON'T CARE if the wrong person goes to jail as long as SOMEONE does.

After what this poor woman went through, she's the LAST person to blame especially when the police had a FAR more likely suspect that admitted to having "had sex with her" and hit her THAT DAY and was also one of the three men she first named. Blame the system, blame the asshole that raped and beat her so badly, lied about it, and went on to rape again only having a "come to Jesus" moment 28 years later while in prison for having done it again and who knows how many more times in the intervening years. The poor innocent man that's taken the rap all these years isn't blaming her. Why are you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Evidence is important Democat Apr 2016 #1
She had a dream. Isn't that enough? Feeling the Bern Apr 2016 #2
considering the percentage of rapes that actually end in a conviction of ANY kind Skittles Apr 2016 #3
It's fucked up AND scary. Wow! C Moon Apr 2016 #4
Aaaand he's African-American nxylas Apr 2016 #5
THAT is so deeply embarrassing to me Xipe Totec Apr 2016 #6
Every time something like this happens, they're always black. Oneironaut Apr 2016 #15
Maybe eveyone involved in this was black? The2ndWheel Apr 2016 #18
I don't know about the others involved, but somehow I doubt the jury was black. ohnoyoudidnt Apr 2016 #25
The victim might not have been motivated by racism nxylas Apr 2016 #26
A moderate google search turns up zilch for the identity of the woman... TipTok Apr 2016 #28
This is fucking horrible. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #7
YEAH... Lets never believe a woman who was raped again!!1! Ohio Joe Apr 2016 #8
She is responsible for her testimony mythology Apr 2016 #9
YEAH... Never believe a woman who is beaten and raped!!1! Ohio Joe Apr 2016 #10
oh FFS ProfessorPlum Apr 2016 #11
Nah GummyBearz Apr 2016 #19
It's fun to pretend as much... regardless of how absurd the pretension may be. LanternWaste Apr 2016 #20
There are multiple biases in this case GummyBearz Apr 2016 #21
No, the OP is not 'MRA-ish' at all muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #13
1 woman gets drunk Ohio Joe Apr 2016 #16
Which is relevant to why she gave 3 names to identify who might have raped her muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #17
No one ever said let's never believe a woman who was raped Downtown Hound Apr 2016 #14
No... She does not Ohio Joe Apr 2016 #22
If you wrongfully finger somebdoy, especially based on a dream Downtown Hound Apr 2016 #23
I'm curious as to why you think she wrongfully fingered him on purpose? TorchTheWitch Apr 2016 #31
I blame her because it's stupid to rely on dreams Downtown Hound Apr 2016 #32
"Clearly" Act_of_Reparation Apr 2016 #12
I only have one question malaise Apr 2016 #24
Hmmm, I'm guessing yes. bermudat Apr 2016 #27
Weren't the other men that she named also AA? TipTok Apr 2016 #30
I can't agree with suing the victim Bradical79 Apr 2016 #29
Our long national nightmare is over. KamaAina Apr 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Man imprisoned for 28 YEA...»Reply #31