Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,199 posts)36. I have read the terms of service and have been a member since 2003
Maybe you should follow your own advice and read the third paragraph of the TOS
Vote for Democrats.
Winning elections is important therefore, advocating in favor of Republican nominees or in favor of third-party spoiler candidates that could split the vote and throw an election to our conservative opponents is never permitted on Democratic Underground.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Someday you might learn how to say I quit being an idiot, instaed of I then I quit being an idiot
Autumn
Apr 2016
#3
No he doesn't have to leave the site. You don't have to belong to the democratic party
Autumn
Apr 2016
#20
Au contraire! Openly supporting another political party on this board is a violation of the TOS.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2016
#24
Oh my friend you are so misinformed. The TOS does not require you be a democrat.
Autumn
Apr 2016
#34
Ahem. "Vote to block" would, in the past, presumably have included a vote for Nader. Capisce? The OP
WinkyDink
Apr 2016
#77
But the poster whining about the OP says he was a Republican voter in the past, so
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2016
#101
Perhaps the OP will clarify after he/she is done crucifying him/herself for our sins.
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2016
#82
They will vote for the democrat to keep a republican out. No clarification needed if you read
Autumn
Apr 2016
#91
How are you? I tried that little "." thing we discussed the other day, it worked well.
Autumn
Apr 2016
#38
I'm as well as can be expected. I love that thing! Also, it is good to see you.
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#44
One particularly nasty "." got banned today. I would like to see that take hold.
Autumn
Apr 2016
#45
I'm Texan too, so please let us do whatever possible to shame Texas republicans.
Jim Beard
Apr 2016
#65
it is democratic underground, it is not democratic party underground. Bernie and I are far more
larkrake
Apr 2016
#46
If someone gets indicted and cuffed and stuffed, you might be sorry. Hang in there
brewens
Apr 2016
#51
I read the replies. You turn from this warm bosom of friendship and love? I'm aghast. n/t
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#57
I grew up on the southside of Oklahoma City. It was a veritable sea of Democrats, a vestige of
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#93
No; it means you deliberately used equivocating language. Don't kid a kidder.
WinkyDink
Apr 2016
#75
DU ToS: "[W]hen general election season begins, DU members must support [the] Democratic nominee."
WinkyDink
Apr 2016
#74
i am not calendar-challenged. I also know that "vote to block" is not synonymous with "vote for the
WinkyDink
Apr 2016
#78
Many "democrats" here are so filled with hate they don't resemble Democrats anymore. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2016
#84
How was it? I was going to but health issues and the parking bans persuaded me tojust
CTyankee
Apr 2016
#111