Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,560 posts)
32. Well, see, it depends on your definition.
Mon May 2, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

Actual conventional large-scale military maneuvers took very little time, and that was what they were talking about with 'the war will be over in six weeks" and even the "Mission Accomplished" noise. Nobody in power cared much about what came after the conquest... err, Liberation. All that "the people will greet us with open arms" and "the war will be over in six weeks" nonsense was just to pacify the marks. Wasted effort, really, since they paid no attention to the will of the people anyway when they embarked on their adventure.

You may recollect that when William Sherman asserted at the beginning of the Civil War that the thing would take years to resolve and involve enormous losses in lives and treasure, he was adjudged insane and relieved of his command. No country ever wants to admit that their proposed war will take years. Remember "Home Before the Leaves Fall" in 1914?

-- Mal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k&r. nt tblue37 May 2016 #1
And in 30 years it will have to be updated again. n/t fasttense May 2016 #2
I'd lock that cartoon as Doonesbury meta. merrily May 2016 #3
You'll laugh, you'll cry ... surrealAmerican May 2016 #4
epic. KG May 2016 #5
Hunter S. Thompson called it on 9-12-01 90-percent May 2016 #6
Miss him shadowmayor May 2016 #14
I miss him yourpaljoey May 2016 #27
war is a racket, war is a lie, war is not healthy for children and other living things Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #7
I remember Doonesburies from 40 years ago... malthaussen May 2016 #8
the same could be said for some Onion headlines from just last year AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #9
Yeah, Poe's Law is everywhere. malthaussen May 2016 #10
there was one hfojvt May 2016 #21
All wars are bankers' wars. As long as we operate with a private money supply FlatBaroque May 2016 #11
Tired of endless wars? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #12
I found the juxtaposition of this thread and another on GD interesting n2doc May 2016 #13
Yes, I noticed that too. Scuba May 2016 #15
+1 Jack Rabbit May 2016 #23
Funny you should mention that. malthaussen May 2016 #31
It's a neocon wargasm Dirty Socialist May 2016 #16
is this some kind of sour grapes mooseprime May 2016 #17
Bush laughs at no WMD in Iraq 2007 RATM435 May 2016 #18
Kreskin predicted at least 30 years there LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #19
I remember Paul Wolfowitz saying before the war that we'd be there for about 6 months. Tobin S. May 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author FreedomRain May 2016 #30
Well, see, it depends on your definition. malthaussen May 2016 #32
Another great Doonesbury strip Gothmog May 2016 #20
Yeah, right! Fritz Walter May 2016 #24
Blood On The Hands Of The Supreme Court colsohlibgal May 2016 #25
This is a bumper sticker I made in 2008: El Supremo May 2016 #26
didn't georgee say it would cost under 1 billion? pansypoo53219 May 2016 #28
I thought it was supposed to pay for itself. teamster633 May 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»30 Years? That's hilario...»Reply #32