Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
20. They were busy trying to keep their culture and land
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:24 PM
May 2016
http://whatcomwatch.org/wpww/?p=348


1823 Johnson v. M’Intosh – first claim of discovery ruling
1832 Cherokee v. Georgia – ruling that Indians are like wards to the guardian
1855 Point Elliot Treaty defines agreement between US government and Pacific northwest Tribes
1859 Point Elliot Treaty proclaimed law of the land
1872 President Grant shrinks Lummi reservation land by Executive Order
1883 Religious Crimes Code bans religious freedom for Native Americans (unless Christian)
1923 Circular 1665 – banned Native American ceremonial dancing
1950 Last termination era – residential schools, forced relocations, extermination of tribalism
1955 Tee-Hit-Ton termination era case – all Indians declared to have been conquered
1970 Lummi refuse $58,000 offer for San Juan Islands and mainland Lummi home areas
1974 Boldt decision – reestablishes Native American treaty claims
1978 American Indian Religious Freedom Act allows aboriginal ceremonies
1979 Lummi tribe closes commercial herring fishery for conservation purposes
1979 Supreme Court ruling on Boldt decision reaffirms rights to treaty fisheries
1988 Supreme Court strikes down American Indian Religious Freedom Act
2011 Pacific International Terminals illegally bulldozes and drills on GPT land

In the case of the territory of the Lummi Indians, the United States offered to pay $58,000 in the early 1970s for the San Juan Islands and mainland homeland areas in Whatcom County. When the Lummi refused this offer the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), as the tribe’s “guardian,” accepted the money on behalf of the tribe (their “wards”) and placed it in the U.S. Treasury. The BIA argued with the Lummi, saying the tribe could use this money to build a school, a hospital, or homes for their people. The Lummi response was to order the BIA off the reservation. After their unceremonious departure, the BIA made it clear that they would hold the money until the tribe “came to its senses.”

At the time of this “offer” the United States was still in the fever of the Termination era, conveniently terminating treaty duties and responsibilities owed to the tribes. During this most recent cycle of termination, which began in the early 1950s, the United States (through overt actions as well as subterfuge) sought to disband all tribes and exterminate tribalism. The BIA was busy relocating the individual Indians as well as whole families into major metropolitan areas to break apart their kinship ties and separate them from their collective tradition of tribalism.9 Adding insult to injury, the BIA was shamelessly paternalistic and accepted offers by non-Indians to buy Lummi land. The ultimate goal of the BIA, an agent and agency of the United States, was to make our exile permanent. Though they are the Bureau of Indian Affairs, their allegiance is first and foremost to the federal government, not the tribes. In other words, the United States attempted to pay itself to gain control of our lands. This action was as corrupt and unconscionable as the perverse application of the Discovery Doctrine in the M’Intosh decision and the twisted principle of wardship in the Cherokee ruling.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R... spanone May 2016 #1
Thank you! Very good news today! suffragette May 2016 #4
Hooray, Lummi Tribe! raging moderate May 2016 #2
Very glad for it! I added a picture to the OP. Think you'll like it. suffragette May 2016 #6
Wado, Lummi Nation! yellerpup May 2016 #3
Salish Sea tribes have been working cross border on environmental issues. suffragette May 2016 #12
Awesome job! yellerpup May 2016 #14
K N R-ed Faux pas May 2016 #5
Thank you! suffragette May 2016 #22
There are some market forces in play, too... Wounded Bear May 2016 #7
Excellent points. Also, traffic studies showed likely delays to emergency vehicles. suffragette May 2016 #8
Treaty rights infringed by environmental impact: Ghost Dog May 2016 #9
Extremely important principle. suffragette May 2016 #10
Way to go Lummi tribe! I love the Northwest! liberal_at_heart May 2016 #11
Through adversity to a win. suffragette May 2016 #23
because they think of the FUTURE. pansypoo53219 May 2016 #13
Yes! A better future for all! suffragette May 2016 #24
There's already an Oil Refinery there. maxsolomon May 2016 #15
Different times... Wounded Bear May 2016 #19
Great response, WB. I added some more info about struggles in 1970s below. suffragette May 2016 #21
They were busy trying to keep their culture and land suffragette May 2016 #20
K&R ReRe May 2016 #16
The photo really captures the place, people and moment. suffragette May 2016 #28
Great news , suffragette! okasha May 2016 #17
So true, okasha! suffragette May 2016 #25
Kick! (n/t) Mike__M May 2016 #18
Thanks! suffragette May 2016 #29
AWESOME! K&R Firebrand Gary May 2016 #26
Good. nt silvershadow May 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tribes prevail, kill prop...»Reply #20