Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What are we supposed to do about illegal immigration? [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)88. I like your idea. As you know any such arrangement with Canada and Mexico would scare the right wing
'New World Order' conspiracy theorists who fixate on a future North American Union.
... its true aim was to expand NAFTA into a North American Union analogous to the European Union (EU), with open borders and a common currency among other features, was being made by the fall of 2006, when conservative commentators Phyllis Schlafly, Jerome Corsi and Howard Phillips started a website dedicated to quashing what they perceived as the coming North American "Socialist mega-state".
John Birch Society
The society opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming it violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and overstepped individual states' rights to enact laws regarding civil rights. The society opposes "one world government", and it has an immigration reduction view on immigration reform. It opposes the United Nations, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and other free trade agreements. They argue the U.S. Constitution has been devalued in favor of political and economic globalization, and that this alleged trend is not accidental. It cited the existence of the former Security and Prosperity Partnership as evidence of a push towards a North American Union.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society#Values
The society opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming it violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and overstepped individual states' rights to enact laws regarding civil rights. The society opposes "one world government", and it has an immigration reduction view on immigration reform. It opposes the United Nations, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and other free trade agreements. They argue the U.S. Constitution has been devalued in favor of political and economic globalization, and that this alleged trend is not accidental. It cited the existence of the former Security and Prosperity Partnership as evidence of a push towards a North American Union.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society#Values
I like your idea. Alas, 'national sovereignty is paramount' folks will be aghast at the idea of negotiating such an agreement with Canada and Mexico.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Net 'illegal immigration' has dropped to close to zero though it is still a great scapegoat for the
pampango
May 2016
#7
How do we balance the latinos with the working class votes, is my question or problem.
runaway hero
May 2016
#17
My wife is both latina and working class. I don't understand the "balancing" thingie.
stone space
May 2016
#19
Quit babbling about walls and pass comprehensive immigration reform legislation.
Redwoods Red
May 2016
#10
Close bussinesses using undocumented workers and confiscate all property
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#30
Disagree. Merely refusing to discriminate does not deserve draconian measures.
stone space
May 2016
#31
You are wrong. Businesses base their entire business model on the use of cheap, undocumented labor.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#32
I am slandering no one. Businesses hire undocumented workers so they can make more money,
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#38
You are slandering the gay couple who hired my wife, and who hosted our wedding reception.
stone space
May 2016
#41
You are slandering our friends. Simply because they didn't discriminate against my wife.
stone space
May 2016
#45
Do you want to shut down their business and confiscate their property or not? (nt)
stone space
May 2016
#65
About what? You'll have to send me to a reeducation camp if you want me to agree that...
stone space
May 2016
#78
I don't consider it disruptive to insist that businesses who profit by exploiting cheap labor
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#95
Yes, "People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." Men in Black
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#103
What we want is to require all businesses to pay full wages rather than pad their profits
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#49
You seem more interested in closing businesses and confiscating property than protecting workers.
stone space
May 2016
#57
Unless we stop the employers who abuse workers, we are not protecting workers.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#59
There is a migrant camp not far from the trail where I take my morning walk.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#94
You said that our friends should have their business closed and their property confiscated.
stone space
May 2016
#69
I like your idea. As you know any such arrangement with Canada and Mexico would scare the right wing
pampango
May 2016
#88
It's pretty silly to me, to believe the "common good" stops at artificial borders.
qdouble
May 2016
#83