Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
5. Yes, you are wrong.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:40 PM
May 2016

The officer believed he had probable cause, and it certainly wasn't clear that he did not. Being wrong and making an arrest is not a criminal offense by itself, and even the state tried to backtrack before the trial ended. If probable cause is later found to be lacking, the remedy is to void the arrest or render evidence inadmissible, not criminally charge a police officer absent other very egregious conduct by that particular officer.

Read the entire article to understand the facts of this particular case and the basis for the court's concern (including reversal of any conviction on appeal).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Motherfucker Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #1
Hope he's convicted philosslayer May 2016 #2
What your basis in actual evidence for any alleged corruption by the judge? branford May 2016 #4
What the fuck? beevul May 2016 #3
Yes, you are wrong. branford May 2016 #5
Fair enough, thats why I asked... beevul May 2016 #6
Note that I'm not claiming an assault charge is NEVER appropriate, branford May 2016 #7
I understand. beevul May 2016 #9
The prosecution stipulated TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge in Freddie Gray-Off...»Reply #5