Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Establishment Dems Fight to Defeat 'Medicare-for-All' in Colorado [View all]
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/05/20/establishment-dems-fight-defeat-medicare-all-colorado
Highlighting the divisions in the Democratic party this election, Colorado's ballot measure for a universal, single-payer healthcare plan is facing unexpected resistance from the very same party that has been calling for such a healthcare plan since the 1990s.
"There is a disconnect between the powers that be and the people," said state senator Irene Aguilar, a former doctor and the chief architect of the statewide 'Medicare-for-all,' called ColoradoCare, in an interview with the Guardian. "The powers that be are incrementalists. There hasn't been a courage of conviction to try and deal with [healthcare coverage]."
<snip>
Clinton's campaign is directly linked to Coloradans for Coloradans, the most prominent organization opposing ColoradoCare. Formed solely to defeat the measure, Coloradans for Coloradans is being funded by the very same consultant firm currently working for the Clinton super PAC Priorities USA, as Lee Fang reported in the Intercept.
While a stance for the ACA and against single payer is the least popular with the public, it is the most popular within a certain sector of the population: pharmaceutical and healthcare companies.
Indeed, in Colorado the "anti-single-payer effort is funded almost entirely by health care industry interests," Fang reported, "including $500,000 from Anthem Inc., the states largest health insurance provider; $40,000 from Cigna, another large health insurer that is current in talks to merge with Anthem; $75,000 from Davita, the dialysis company; $25,000 from Delta Dental, the largest dental insurer in the state; and $100,000 from SCL Health, the faith-based hospital chain."
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would these be the same establishment Democrats who assured us Obamacare was but
merrily
May 2016
#1
A group of Bernie's campaign staff split off of the campaign to start Bernie's next assault.
Dustlawyer
May 2016
#32
this sort of verifies what Bernie has been saying all the time-The third way gang!
dmosh42
May 2016
#2
Basically said it? She couldn't have said it any louder than the scream when she said it. n/t
tom_kelly
May 2016
#34
A 1995 Clinton era trade deal made it that way. To get single payer we have to change it first.
Baobab
May 2016
#59
There's a difference in saying it won't happen with our Congress and saying she doesn't want it to
Hoyt
May 2016
#53
Again, she says single payer won't happen. Similarly if asked, she would say cancer will not be
Hoyt
May 2016
#90
She had a good plan at the time. Might as well criticize Truman who first proposed
Hoyt
May 2016
#65
It was a cover up to cover up that they were writing an FTA that made single payer FTA illegal.
Baobab
May 2016
#113
It was not a good plan considering that at the same time they were writing the global deal
Baobab
May 2016
#107
She had to hide GVT5- people would have gone insane in 1994 if they knew about GVT5
Baobab
May 2016
#106
"Public option" fails because of bothGATS Article I:3 (b)(c) issue AND AdverseSelection>death spiral
Baobab
May 2016
#75
The GATS is junk. Any country is allowed to rescind GATS assuming it even applies in this
Hoyt
May 2016
#83
There is absolutely nothing in all of that which prohibits the USA from going to a Public Option,
Hoyt
May 2016
#89
USTR supports my position, other countries can't have it. We obviously can't have it either.
Baobab
May 2016
#99
Looks like Maine went ahead with its health plan, despite inquiry you cite written 10 years ago.
Hoyt
May 2016
#102
Thats what I meant. Nothing can change because of GATS. ACA is another in a chain of failures.
Baobab
May 2016
#110
Things have changed since GATS started a few decades ago. You need a new world conspiracy theory.
Hoyt
May 2016
#111
"There is a disconnect between the powers that be and the people" clearly states the party`s problem
democrank
May 2016
#7
See my post above, Bernie and some of his now former campaign staff have a plan.
Dustlawyer
May 2016
#33
The D brand is severely tarnished. It's looking a lot like the R brand of yesteryear. -nt
CrispyQ
May 2016
#35
well gosh, I wonder why dems are fighting against medicare for all since they would
bbgrunt
May 2016
#37
Very appropriate to this situation, given Hillary's propensity to grandiosity and millitarism.
Baobab
May 2016
#93
I thought all Dems were for 100% healthcare coverage? But not Hillary, huh?
Zen Democrat
May 2016
#101
I'm not sure why this is surprising. The ACA passed without a single republican vote,
hughee99
May 2016
#103