Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Establishment Dems Fight to Defeat 'Medicare-for-All' in Colorado [View all]stupidicus
(2,570 posts)87. none of that alters the deliberate deception behind the claim
she's a "single-payer" supporter
it's a free country, so be as dishonest as you want. Just don't expect others to not point that out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would these be the same establishment Democrats who assured us Obamacare was but
merrily
May 2016
#1
A group of Bernie's campaign staff split off of the campaign to start Bernie's next assault.
Dustlawyer
May 2016
#32
this sort of verifies what Bernie has been saying all the time-The third way gang!
dmosh42
May 2016
#2
Basically said it? She couldn't have said it any louder than the scream when she said it. n/t
tom_kelly
May 2016
#34
A 1995 Clinton era trade deal made it that way. To get single payer we have to change it first.
Baobab
May 2016
#59
There's a difference in saying it won't happen with our Congress and saying she doesn't want it to
Hoyt
May 2016
#53
Again, she says single payer won't happen. Similarly if asked, she would say cancer will not be
Hoyt
May 2016
#90
She had a good plan at the time. Might as well criticize Truman who first proposed
Hoyt
May 2016
#65
It was a cover up to cover up that they were writing an FTA that made single payer FTA illegal.
Baobab
May 2016
#113
It was not a good plan considering that at the same time they were writing the global deal
Baobab
May 2016
#107
She had to hide GVT5- people would have gone insane in 1994 if they knew about GVT5
Baobab
May 2016
#106
"Public option" fails because of bothGATS Article I:3 (b)(c) issue AND AdverseSelection>death spiral
Baobab
May 2016
#75
The GATS is junk. Any country is allowed to rescind GATS assuming it even applies in this
Hoyt
May 2016
#83
There is absolutely nothing in all of that which prohibits the USA from going to a Public Option,
Hoyt
May 2016
#89
USTR supports my position, other countries can't have it. We obviously can't have it either.
Baobab
May 2016
#99
Looks like Maine went ahead with its health plan, despite inquiry you cite written 10 years ago.
Hoyt
May 2016
#102
Thats what I meant. Nothing can change because of GATS. ACA is another in a chain of failures.
Baobab
May 2016
#110
Things have changed since GATS started a few decades ago. You need a new world conspiracy theory.
Hoyt
May 2016
#111
"There is a disconnect between the powers that be and the people" clearly states the party`s problem
democrank
May 2016
#7
See my post above, Bernie and some of his now former campaign staff have a plan.
Dustlawyer
May 2016
#33
The D brand is severely tarnished. It's looking a lot like the R brand of yesteryear. -nt
CrispyQ
May 2016
#35
well gosh, I wonder why dems are fighting against medicare for all since they would
bbgrunt
May 2016
#37
Very appropriate to this situation, given Hillary's propensity to grandiosity and millitarism.
Baobab
May 2016
#93
I thought all Dems were for 100% healthcare coverage? But not Hillary, huh?
Zen Democrat
May 2016
#101
I'm not sure why this is surprising. The ACA passed without a single republican vote,
hughee99
May 2016
#103