Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I will not offer "thoughts and prayers" for the victims in Orlando [View all]Orrex
(66,825 posts)75. "Big gun control"
Which Rightwing media outlet fed you that meme, I wonder?
If they wanted to actually fix something they would lobby for making NICS actually possible to use for private sales voluntarily...frankly this could be done by executive order...
Independent private gun sales should be banned, and anyone attempting to buy or sell a firearm through private transaction should be jailed for ten years with no probation for each firearm attempted to be bought or sold. Private gun sales could be permitted if effected through a licensed agency able to perform background checks. This is fully consistent with the sacrosanct 2nd amendment.
Background checks and their results must be permanently maintained in a database freely accessible to the public. This is fully consistent with the sacrosanct 2nd amendment.
All guns must be registered, and any gun not registered must be impounded and the owner jailed for ten years with no probation for each unregistered firearm. This is fully consistent with the sacrosanct 2nd amendment.
Gun owners must be held responsible for their guns at all times, and they must be aware of each gun's location at all times. Theft must be reported within one business day; otherwise the gun owner is full accessory to any crimes committed with such guns. This is fully consistent with the sacrosanct 2nd amendment.
Gun advocates will invariably howl about their perceived right to privacy, which they imagine to trump all other considerations, but they can stuff that bullshit up their well-oiled barrels. My legal history is freely available to the public, despite my concerns about privacy; the history of my home's ownership is freely available to the public, despite my concerns about privacy. Gun registry should be equally freely available.
They also make some ridiculous noise about the likelihood that they'll be targeted for theft if people know that they have guns, but fuck that cowardly bullshit as well; secure storage is a basic component of responsible gun ownership, and if you can't step up to the demands of responsible gun ownership, then you sure as hell don't deserve to own one.
In short, I'm tired of the bullshit fired at us 24/7 from gun advocates who care about nothing so much as their precious, precious guns despite their claims to the contrary.
Gun advocates have demonstrated time and again--even after Sandy Hook, even this morningafter Orlando--that they advocate for guns above all else, and the safety of others is of no concern to them. Gun owners have said enough, and it's time for them to shut the fuck up and step aside to let others handle the problem that gun advocates have so eagerly enabled for decades.
Reply however the fuck you want because I know what you think on the matter and I have no interest in reading NRA propaganda on DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I will not offer "thoughts and prayers" for the victims in Orlando [View all]
Bluzmann57
Jun 2016
OP
Sorry but the victims will be mourned and it is not about you and your issues.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2016
#4
In Florida, guns are banned from being taken into bars. So there was supposed to be no guns.
Kang Colby
Jun 2016
#42
I believe that your average concealed carrier wouldn't just start "spraying bullets".
Kang Colby
Jun 2016
#46
Dictionary definitions and legal definitions are two completely different things..
pipoman
Jun 2016
#20
Why? Constitution doesn't say what constitutes an arm. Would the constitution need to be
MillennialDem
Jun 2016
#25
No it isn't. Scotus is free to overrule itself. Much easier than an amendment - for evidence I
MillennialDem
Jun 2016
#83
It DOES say specifically the "press". All other communications need not apply?
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#81
Obviously there are limits to any freedom. Yelling fire in a crowded theater is not
MillennialDem
Jun 2016
#84
It is the constitution and subsequent SCOTUS rulings that rule out just about every bill
pipoman
Jun 2016
#113
It's my understanding that even Heller left intact the right for the feds
Francis Booth
Jun 2016
#115
Which would be a 'taking' under the fifth amendment. Got the budget to pay $750 per?
X_Digger
Jun 2016
#77
I'd support reclassifying semi-automatics with detachable magazines under the NFA
Recursion
Jun 2016
#28
"In common use for lawful purposes" is the federal standard for NFA registration...
pipoman
Jun 2016
#105
Ever think it's insensitive to offer thoughts and prayers to atheists/agnostics during tragedies?
MillennialDem
Jun 2016
#18
Offering your prayers is advertising your beliefs. Thoughts maybe. Our hearts go out to etc.... woul
MillennialDem
Jun 2016
#26
Great point - I'm so pissed about this that I skipped the obvious connection. Thanks. n/t
CincyDem
Jun 2016
#53
No problem. It's something we must all keep in mind during this upcoming presidential election.
MoonRiver
Jun 2016
#57
I have a Pulse. Je suis Charlie. Boston Strong. Remain Calm and Carry On. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2016
#14
I think you're right. That was the moment to act. But our own Harry Reid wouldn't let any new gun
Francis Booth
Jun 2016
#114
Frankly, to my mind, the belief that there's a giant invisible man in the sky is part of the problem
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#103
