Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)

2. The Second Amendment

Reply to YouDig (Original post)

Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:32 PM

Jun 2016

I think only members of a well regulated militia should have access to firearms. "Well regulated" means overseen by the government in a way that weeds out the nut jobs. Unfortunately, the courts do not agree with me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How rational societies respond to mass shootings. [View all] YouDig Jun 2016 OP

It is undeniable. Tighter gun laws reduce or end this kind of occurrence. Squinch Jun 2016 #1

The Second Amendment HassleCat Jun 2016 #2

When the 2nd was written "well regulated" had nothing to do with being overseen by the government. Waldorf Jun 2016 #5

Yes, we've heard these arguments 1000 times Dem2 Jun 2016 #8

Yes, good working order. HassleCat Jun 2016 #9

"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #3

Just heard a guy on MSNBC say 134 this year alone Bluzmann57 Jun 2016 #4

This gets definitional; Mother Jones found 72 mass shootings in the US since 1982 Recursion Jun 2016 #7

OTOH I'd rather we focused policy on the "normal" shootings that kill many more people Recursion Jun 2016 #6

Yeah, fuck people's constitutional rights! Odin2005 Jun 2016 #10

Fuck the "right" to have an assault rifle. YouDig Jun 2016 #11