General Discussion

LenaBaby61

(6,972 posts)

31. NOT something....

Reply to cali (Original post)

Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:57 AM

Jun 2016

I'd EVER Endorse, and certainly not purchase.

This is wrong on so many levels and completely unnecessary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The morons at Wonkette are selling a tee shirt depicting HRC holding Trump's severed head [View all] cali Jun 2016 OP

That kind of crap doesn't help at all. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #1

The blowback from this hasn't started yet. It will be a big fucking wave cali Jun 2016 #2

Snark travels around the world while insight is putting its boots on Fumesucker Jun 2016 #3

Looks like something republicans would do. Cobalt Violet Jun 2016 #4

Wow, that's a weak-ass photoshop job. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #5

Right? joshcryer Jun 2016 #17

Awful. It plays into the notion that violence is just fine so long as the victors are righteous femmedem Jun 2016 #6

Poe's law. n/t seabeckind Jun 2016 #13

Too biblical and poor taste. OnDoutside Jun 2016 #7

I would have preferred Gentileschi's version myself. Brickbat Jun 2016 #8

OK, you got me cali Jun 2016 #10

. Brickbat Jun 2016 #11

If it ain't Baroque, don't fix it! Dr. Strange Jun 2016 #35

Best post of the year! nt glennward Jun 2016 #60

The original painting references a Jewish widow who killed an Assyrian general. MADem Jun 2016 #9

I see a lot of hate Trump here. seabeckind Jun 2016 #12

Obviously the opposition notices. I couldn't possibly have made that clearer. cali Jun 2016 #14

Aww, hate against a racist bigot xenophobe! joshcryer Jun 2016 #16

The point I am trying to make is that seabeckind Jun 2016 #18

DU isn't "becoming" anything. Try reading the TOS--it's been the same since 2011. MADem Jun 2016 #32

Has nothing to do with the TOS seabeckind Jun 2016 #36

If you are bashing or trashing Democrats..... MADem Jun 2016 #40

Oh no, it was never intended to be a bash of democrats. seabeckind Jun 2016 #42

When you say "Case in point" that is usually followed by an example. MADem Jun 2016 #43

Not always. seabeckind Jun 2016 #45

A lot of them had constituents who agreed with the notion that Bush should have the "authority" MADem Jun 2016 #47

Whatever helps you sleep at night. n/t seabeckind Jun 2016 #48

What an odd comment. I don't lose sleep over problematic votes in Congress--in the 90s or later. nt MADem Jun 2016 #49

It refers to a rationalization on your part. seabeckind Jun 2016 #50

You should really stop making the conversation about me--or anyone else with whom you converse. MADem Jun 2016 #54

I calls em as I see em. seabeckind Jun 2016 #57

I'll bet you do. nt MADem Jun 2016 #63

Obviously protected speech. joshcryer Jun 2016 #15

Do they really think this will get her votes? notadmblnd Jun 2016 #19

No. They are using it to sell their product. seabeckind Jun 2016 #20

Wonkette I already intently dislike, I consider thir work (her work?) to be habitually nasty and Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #21

perfectly said. cali Jun 2016 #22

It's Wednesday and the power of speech is returning to me..... Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #23

They're elitists and unhumorous (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2016 #28

Anna Marie Cox (the "her" in Wonkette) stepped away from her editorial duties there years ago. MADem Jun 2016 #33

I doubt you'll see many on the street, but... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #24

have you written that message about the horrid Hillary products offered? cali Jun 2016 #25

This is gearing up to be the nastiest campaign in my lifetime... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #27

Doubt that will be a big seller for them. emulatorloo Jun 2016 #26

That's dumb PJMcK Jun 2016 #29

Talk of guillotines, tumbrels, Mme. Defarge, "French razor," "French Solution" etc. are a cherished TacoD Jun 2016 #30

NOT something.... LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #31

At Whois, "the morons" seems to be singular, not plural. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #34

decapitation is not a progressive value Amishman Jun 2016 #37

Kinda funny how the wingnuts don't get as worked up about the shit sold AT Trump rallies Major Nikon Jun 2016 #38

Not OK Bettie Jun 2016 #39

I'd consider it par for the course. You don't have to look very hard to find cruel images MADem Jun 2016 #44

The concern is dripping. trumad Jun 2016 #41

you really are... paranoid here, trumad cali Jun 2016 #58

And you are a big yawn. trumad Jun 2016 #59

lol. whatever, darling trumad. You're so cute. cali Jun 2016 #61

Thank you trumad Jun 2016 #62

But when Palin used targets to indicate target states, that was an outrage! Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #46

Hell's bells Seeking Serenity Jun 2016 #51

Boo hoo mwrguy Jun 2016 #52

It's okay when we do it...their poutrage can simmer. ileus Jun 2016 #53

Holofernes apologia. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #55

I would rather have this one. Beacool Jun 2016 #56

What does the original painting portray? What Biblical story? Is there a metaphor here? aikoaiko Jun 2016 #64