Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(12,723 posts)

6. I would rather they spent ten billion on bands and half a billion on guns.

Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:44 PM

Jun 2016

Oh well, 'merica gots its priorities.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fine with me. House votes to nix military bands at dinners, dances [View all] cali Jun 2016 OP

Never fear, there's outside contractors ready to step in... JHB Jun 2016 #1

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. cali Jun 2016 #2

It all depends on your sodium intake... JHB Jun 2016 #4

Bingo. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #5

No, the band members won't be making that much... JHB Jun 2016 #7

People that work for military contractors Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #11

Those guys weren't playing in a band JHB Jun 2016 #12

Sadly, you are probably right. AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #15

Absolutely matt819 Jun 2016 #19

Yes. When I have $500 million to cut, I always start with the band. CincyDem Jun 2016 #3

That's what happens in Education AwakeAtLast Jun 2016 #21

Damn... 3catwoman3 Jun 2016 #8

WINNER!!!!! monmouth4 Jun 2016 #10

+1 uponit7771 Jun 2016 #13

Damn right, & stopping the hoooge war profiteering. dmr Jun 2016 #18

Now they can campaign on having cut military spending. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #14

Well there won't be enough musicians in the future.......... mrmpa Jun 2016 #16

The House voted????? tavernier Jun 2016 #20

They will now take an extended recess AwakeAtLast Jun 2016 #22