Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I think the new rules will have unintended consequences... [View all]seabeckind
(1,957 posts)93. Some of it comes across as unfair.
Before the change bashing for bashing sake seemed to be acceptable or at least a blind eye.
Now suggesting that an bias is implied is met with a reverse attack of some sort. A response to that, no matter how carefully worded is sometimes alerted.
Catch the wrong jury and your continued input, no matter how useful, is lost forever.
OTOH, I've seen historical instances in real life where that was a good thing. Sometimes forcing the rebel out of the rigid work environment started a whole new industry.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't know about that. Yesterday, I participated on no less than three juries.
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#111
Oh ok. I know discussionist. I just didn't realize DI was short for that. Thank you
AgadorSparticus
Jun 2016
#88
Actually DI is not everything goes, the cons over there are as thin skinned as Trump. nt
Rex
Jun 2016
#18
This site isn't for "opposing sides". You can always do that on some other website.
Lil Missy
Jun 2016
#26
What I have found is that you talk about most anything. It's really HOW you say it.
AgadorSparticus
Jun 2016
#74
Some percentage of the DU population isn't here for debate or new information...
TipTok
Jun 2016
#84
On which note, is it me, or are jury results not reported back to jurors anymore?
villager
Jun 2016
#7
Thanks. So I guess people with 0-7 verdicts "agin' 'em," who get the time outs...
villager
Jun 2016
#16
I think that would be very hard to do since you don't kno what forum/group it was posted in, nor
hlthe2b
Jun 2016
#29
I suspect the issue is that sometimes a juror response was far more ugly than the post in question.
HuckleB
Jun 2016
#129
Yes, there are workarounds, but especially with these more fine-tuned iterations of voting....
villager
Jun 2016
#136
Because people kept posting the results leading to more meta discussion? n/t
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#13
I still say we should have the right to complain about Dem politicians without worry that
vkkv
Jun 2016
#30
Most Republican trolls that come here don't promote Republicans either. Their aim...
Moonwalk
Jun 2016
#34
Really? "a lot of rerecent posts"?? I'm here all of the time since I work out of my house and I have
vkkv
Jun 2016
#37
Maybe. They may also turn DU into an echo chamber where important truths are muzzled because
Gene Debs
Jun 2016
#42
Remember how many jury notifications were being re-posted verbatim in threads?
emulatorloo
Jun 2016
#81