Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Matrosov

(1,098 posts)

16. Same-sex marriage

Reply to Proud Liberal Dem (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 27, 2016, 04:50 PM

Jun 2016

They try to make a case for states' rights when it comes to same-sex marriage, and they tell the federal government to stay out of it and let the people of the states decide.. Yet which party is also the one that thought it would be great if the Constitution could be amended to define marriage between a man and a women and essentially outlaw same-sex marriage through the federal government? Yup.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Across the country, the SCOTUS decisison re abotion, really undermines T.R.A.P. [View all] cali Jun 2016 OP

K&R... spanone Jun 2016 #1

WI is a classic case of Repugs putting in regulations these last years. riversedge Jun 2016 #2

Texas, Wisconsin, MS, LA, and on and on cali Jun 2016 #3

Exactly. These TRAP laws were always where the real battle was being fought. vintx Jun 2016 #4

There is now a clear test. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #5

For the party that complains endlessly about government regulations- even good sensible regulations Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #6

That is an excellent point. cali Jun 2016 #7

Because the uterus is a deadly weapon that must be tightly regulated. Orrex Jun 2016 #8

I should alert on you for using the word "uterus" in public elljay Jun 2016 #12

if only a uterus were a gun!!!! Sheepshank Jun 2016 #15

Same-sex marriage Matrosov Jun 2016 #16

GOOD! libodem Jun 2016 #9

Agreed... Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #10

Key Question asked by SCOTUS: "Has this law ever helped any women have a safer abortion" Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #11

Exactly n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #13

I got the strong sense localroger Jun 2016 #18

first steps, it's a start and as necessary and as usual changes are made incrementally Sheepshank Jun 2016 #14

We ought to push back in a similar pattern. DirkGently Jun 2016 #17

Agreed. We need to push back, and HARD. And EVERYWHERE. calimary Jun 2016 #21

k and r niyad Jun 2016 #19

Legal recourse is necessarily ad-hoc... malthaussen Jun 2016 #20