Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
9. IMO it must go beyond firing them.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 08:44 AM
Jul 2016

People in positions of authority in the DNC who are shown to have violated the tenets of the Party's charter need to be banned from employment by the DNC and future political appointments that are paid for by contributions from the DNC.

People who abused the Party, should be banned from recieving an endorsement from the Party.

Like everyone else, all I have to go on is the media reported narrative. The DNC needs to conduct an investigation of its staff and of it's practices. It needs to be done with cool-headed, rational deliberation. It's going to take months to get to the bottom of the problem, more to inact a just response, and more to establish a team ethic that reduces the chances of similar future events.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Old tweet + Marsha Fudge is chair as of yesterday. BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #1
I believe Fudge is chair of the convention unc70 Jul 2016 #3
I wonder if she has heard the "other" rumors? leftofcool Jul 2016 #6
Swell. Scuba Jul 2016 #2
At the moment DNC staff and -intellectual- property HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #4
Oh My! Ford_Prefect Jul 2016 #5
And some if those staffers need to be fired Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #7
IMO it must go beyond firing them. HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #9
I strongly agree. Those who planned to trash Bernie to their 'Southern Baptist peeps' Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #11
There are people for whom the end will always justify the means HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #12
Unfortunately, dumbcat Jul 2016 #17
I'm not so sure most people here have their livelihoods at stake in the election HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #23
The Russian staffers editing the e-mails? LanternWaste Jul 2016 #19
Donna can only assume the worst. joshcryer Jul 2016 #8
Why? Igel Jul 2016 #10
I agree. Calista241 Jul 2016 #14
They don't have anything "worse." joshcryer Jul 2016 #20
commentators on MSNBC were saying yesterday they could be holding off on releasing napkinz Jul 2016 #18
There is no damaging info. joshcryer Jul 2016 #21
i'm sure her bud karl rove keeps her informed. KG Jul 2016 #13
I guess I don't get it maxrandb Jul 2016 #15
The damage doesn't come from what is actually in the emails csziggy Jul 2016 #16
Yup ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Donna Brazile: "more emai...»Reply #9