Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why are shooting sports still allowed at the Olympics? [View all]sarisataka
(22,695 posts)6. Simple, shooting is not
about killing. It is a skill sport.
Many Olympic sports are/ were about combat. Archery, boxing, fencing, javelin... and more are combat skills in a competitive format.
The pentathlon is a combination event testing all the skills considered necessary for a modern (19th century) soldier.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
225 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well nearly all sports involve one person dominating another so when you get right down to it
hollowdweller
Aug 2016
#153
Ok, your opinion. Others have different opinions, including gun control advocates.
RelativelyJones
Aug 2016
#32
marksmanship is not expressly meant for the killing of humans, people still hunt for food
Demonaut
Aug 2016
#3
And the fact that the skill facilitates faster and easier killing is a coincidence?
loyalsister
Aug 2016
#26
Knife skills are taught in cooking school. I am outraged that culinary institutes glorify violence
emulatorloo
Aug 2016
#29
How often do you see movies of KNIFE MURDERERS! I can think of many, starting with Hitchcock's
emulatorloo
Aug 2016
#51
There are no "squirt knives". However, there are "disappearing dagger" toys
emulatorloo
Aug 2016
#55
You have a point. I will say that the olympics don't have the events most gun nuts find exciting --
Hoyt
Aug 2016
#7
I enjoy shooting at targets. I find it a relaxing hobby and meet some nice people there.
Waldorf
Aug 2016
#111
No, I'd rather take my firearms to the range and shoot them. Besides, about 99.99% of them are not
Waldorf
Aug 2016
#116
View it as part of sick habit, but depends on what you fantasize about when squeezing the trigger.
Hoyt
Aug 2016
#115
Minority opinion? 80-100 million gun owners (fanciers as you call them) owning 350 firearms
Waldorf
Aug 2016
#121
Do the math -- 25 - 33% of population. That a minority. And of that, a lot just have an old gun
Hoyt
Aug 2016
#129
Sometimes I wonder if he thinks everybody at the range is just practicing to snipe someone from
Waldorf
Aug 2016
#123
How else are hunters supposed to become efficient and accurate with their firearms?
Marengo
Aug 2016
#122
I don't understand the antagonism against range practice. Begs the question as to which he...
Marengo
Aug 2016
#126
It's not rocket science or a major athletic feat. Christ, have you ever seen some of those yahoos
Hoyt
Aug 2016
#130
So, if I were to loan you an M1 rifle and take you to a John C Garand match, you would shoot...
Marengo
Aug 2016
#132
My point is, genius, you leave your guns at home until going hunting (I'm talking deer, etc.).
Hoyt
Aug 2016
#117
Do you keep those pics saved in a text file or you have to google search each time?
snooper2
Aug 2016
#156
Good post. The ancient games were based primarily on combat arts and implememts.
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#38
And many modern sports are more or less obvious proxies for our warlike tendencies
bhikkhu
Aug 2016
#85
"channeling" warrior tendencies into games is practice by a rainbow of cultures.
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#134
Yes I'm aware of the politicization of the olympics. 1936 for example. Still doesn't make Archery
emulatorloo
Aug 2016
#41
I never said you did. I used summer 1936 as an example of political manipulation of Olympics
emulatorloo
Aug 2016
#44
Shooting has been a part of the modern Olympics since the first one in 1896.
NuclearDem
Aug 2016
#48
My personal fave is the Indiscriminate Carpet-Bombing, but I hear that's being dropped...
PoutrageFatigue
Aug 2016
#161
Thanks! Was unaware that the US shooting team caused a brutal bloodbath in Rio today
emulatorloo
Aug 2016
#28
The problem is with what that inaminate object represents to those who lust for it
Matrosov
Aug 2016
#170
Plenty of people will answer that question "yes" - the risk is worth it. Millions in fact seem to.
jmg257
Aug 2016
#222
Not everybody with a gun is a gun nut, the gun nuts just give other people a very bad name
Warpy
Aug 2016
#53
"If gun nuts wouldn't enable civilian gun ownership, those with criminal records........
pablo_marmol
Aug 2016
#172
"That there Constutition... don't give you the right not to be shot by one."
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#183
More kids, families and innocent people are being wiped out by alcohol consumption
pault420
Aug 2016
#150
Your "moral" dilemma w/regard to guns is no different than a fundie's "moral" dilemma with gays.
pablo_marmol
Aug 2016
#174
Exactly- see the Robert Bork quote in post #184. Your post brought it to mind.
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#185
Your 'issue' is merely Robert Bork's theory of 'moral harm', applied to a different subject:
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#184
Károly Takács is one of the most inspiring competitors of the modern games
LongtimeAZDem
Aug 2016
#179
The complete surrender of armed power to the state is analogous to the legalization...
Marengo
Aug 2016
#217
Too many countires, including the US, still place cudos on marksmanship programs and the like.
jmg257
Aug 2016
#208
Not just shooting teams teach guns are acceptable - millions grow up learning that at home.
jmg257
Aug 2016
#223
Do you realize that the Olympics have always been a contest of martial skills?
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2016
#224