Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
8. In your case of black-on-white homicide, SYG is likely beneficial.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:29 PM
Jun 2012

SYG is not "invoked" against anybody. SYG are a set of laws that set the standard for and shift burden of proof to the prosocution meaning the state must now PROVE the killer did NOT act in self defense. In practice, SYG means that a conviction must be based on physical or eyewitness evidence. By definition, SYG moves the case further down the path of "innocent until proven guilty" thereby making the any case of self defense easier to win. Prior to SYG and CD laws, a defendant usually had to convince the jury that a killing was self defense - this can be more difficult with racial prejudice and a black defendant likely talking to a mostly/all white jury.

If you are black and just killed a white person in self defense... you should hope there are SYG laws because now a prosocution has to present facts that disprove your story. Regardless of your skin complexion, SYG dictates your story stands until PROVEN otherwise.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Previously posted on Wednesday ProgressiveProfessor Jun 2012 #1
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #12
Hyperbole and factually incorrect. OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #2
You've misunderstood this cartoon. EOTE Jun 2012 #3
Sure they can... it's called life insurance. OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #5
Way to throw out non-sequitors there. EOTE Jun 2012 #6
In your case of black-on-white homicide, SYG is likely beneficial. OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #8
No, it certainly is not. EOTE Jun 2012 #10
It sounds as if the problem rests with the police... not the law. OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #11
Nitpick at trivial nothings, much? 99Forever Jun 2012 #4
Well, they tend to not look at facts Ichingcarpenter Jun 2012 #13
It's a cartoon.. 99Forever Jun 2012 #14
I think that hyperbole is part and parcel of both humor and satire LanternWaste Jun 2012 #7
In the words of White Goodman.... OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #9
K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Shooting people causin...»Reply #8