Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 24-hour poll: Does DU need judges as well as juries? [View all]Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)46. And some did it poorly,
I much prefer "I know it when I see it" consensus, there was one moderator who was more or less guardian angel to a particular individual who seems to have left our company and would delete anything where he was getting called out on his bullshit. Practically shutting down debate on that issue since he would thread crap every discussion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Too many moderators on DU2 moderated with their pet cause front and center
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Jun 2012
#19
The moderators' job was to determine whether an alerted post broke the rules as they were written.
Rhiannon12866
Jun 2012
#45
I would have voted for a tie-breaker option. A 3-3 ruling goes to a tie-breaker.
Kalidurga
Jun 2012
#20
What's the point of having a judge? we might as well have mods back. Stay with the juries.nt
Javaman
Jun 2012
#24