Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)How Much Damage Did the Debate Do to Donald Trump? - The New Yorker [View all]
The reviews are in, and they are virtually unanimous: Donald Trump had a horrible debate on Monday night against Hillary Clinton. He was unprepared, unconvincing, and off-putting.
<snip>
It will take until the weekend to know for sure how much damage Trump did to his candidacy on Monday. Thats when a slew of national and battleground-state polls taken after the debate are due to be published. The small amount of data we already have, though, suggests that Clinton can expect to enjoy a significant bounce.The Politico/Morning Consult poll is just one survey, but the numbers are telling.
Nine (9%) per cent of the respondents to the Politico/Morning Consult poll said the debate changed their minds about whom to vote for. Nine per cent of the electorate is a lot. If we assume that two-thirds of these voters switched to Clinton and one-third switched to Trump, which would be in line with the finding that Clinton won the debate by a two-to-one margin among respondents, we could expect the polls to swing in her favor by three (3%) per cent. - The New Yorker
<snip>
It will take until the weekend to know for sure how much damage Trump did to his candidacy on Monday. Thats when a slew of national and battleground-state polls taken after the debate are due to be published. The small amount of data we already have, though, suggests that Clinton can expect to enjoy a significant bounce.The Politico/Morning Consult poll is just one survey, but the numbers are telling.
Nine (9%) per cent of the respondents to the Politico/Morning Consult poll said the debate changed their minds about whom to vote for. Nine per cent of the electorate is a lot. If we assume that two-thirds of these voters switched to Clinton and one-third switched to Trump, which would be in line with the finding that Clinton won the debate by a two-to-one margin among respondents, we could expect the polls to swing in her favor by three (3%) per cent. - The New Yorker
If I'm reading this correctly and if HRC's post debate bump turns out to be only 3%, that 3% if added straight to each state's current average on FiveThirtyEight.com, would mean the following:
Puts out of reach
Pennsylvania +5.7 in favor of HRC
Michigan +6.6
Colorado +4.6
Wisconsin +6.8
Virginia +7.6
Minnesota +7.3
New Hamshire +5.7
Reverses these states into HRCs column
Florida +2.4
Nevada +2.4
North Carolina +1.8
Ohio +1.2
It would also put in play
Iowa +0
Arizona -1.5 In favor of Donald
Georgia -2.6
We could be talking landslide and picking off congressional seats once again, that's how good Hillary was on Monday night.
22 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think this may happen if he has a repeat of the first performance in the second debate?
kentuck
Sep 2016
#20
"We could be talking landslide and picking off congressional seats once again, that's . . . .
Stinky The Clown
Sep 2016
#22