Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PubliusEnigma

(1,583 posts)

9. That explanation leaves a lot to be desired. I don't buy it.

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #6)

Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:49 PM

Feb 2021

It could have affected the outcome in the Court of Public Opinion even if it didn't change any Republican votes.

Sadly, now this looks like a Trump victory to the people we hope never vote for him again.

His team was worried about witnesses. They were throwing the fit. Why did we let them get away so easily?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why no witnesses?? [View all] PubliusEnigma Feb 2021 OP

Some suggest that witnesses are best saved for upcoming criminal trials nt intrepidity Feb 2021 #1

Good threads on this . Here's one soothsayer Feb 2021 #2

Foregone conclusion. The fix was in pfitz59 Feb 2021 #3

Some reporting is saying the witnesses were going cold. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #4

I was a bit taken aback by that jimfields33 Feb 2021 #5

This question has been rehashed all day ad nauseam, but once more, in a nutshell, The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2021 #6

That explanation leaves a lot to be desired. I don't buy it. PubliusEnigma Feb 2021 #9

Several Reasons leftieNanner Feb 2021 #7

Witnesses would have made no difference. Trump could have done a video admitting his guilt. Autumn Feb 2021 #8