General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I did NOT "defend the Klan" [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)levels on this board. Not everyone is as rhetorically advanced as you are. I am defending that fact. Objectivity requires that we find out what is naive and what is disingenuous. I think that is a useful point to the goals of your own, or anyone's, efforts, because the difference between naive and disingenuous is the difference between a potential ally for your goals, or more opposition to y/our goals.
If a person is naive, helping them see the mistakes in their assumptions helps everyone.
I have already decided that OP's previous support of the KKK in that other thread is definite/conclusive support of the KKK, and yes you are right there is nothing in that support which denotes anything about class, but the fact remains that, for all I know, his/her support of the KKK could be as much out of error as it could be out of actual racism and I would rather ask a person to clarify than accuse them without enough information, because if racism is wrong, because any one of us is valuable, then it is wrong because ALL of us are valuable and I'd like to at least give that value a chance to make its own autonomous choices, before I engage in any oppression based on such limited information.