Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

J_William_Ryan

(3,438 posts)
6. Not with the current Supreme Court, no.
Sun Dec 11, 2016, 12:03 PM
Dec 2016

Trump will simply be replacing Scalia with another reactionary rightwing ideologue hostile to privacy rights.

There will still be a 5 to 4 majority who will vote to acknowledge a woman’s right to privacy, as we saw with Whole Women’s Health this year.

If Kennedy, Breyer, or Ginsburg should be compelled to leave the Court, however, while Trump is president – or any Republican, for that matter – then the right to privacy is indeed in jeopardy.

And if the lower courts follow settled, accepted 14th Amendment jurisprudence recognizing a right to privacy, it’s likely an abortion case may not make it to the Court at all.

The Ohio measure is very similar to an Oklahoma law invalidated by the Oklahoma Supreme Court, citing Casey, where no appeal was warranted.

This is not to say we shouldn’t be alarmed by a Trump ‘presidency’ with regard to privacy rights – there’s every reason to be alarmed, making it imperative a Democrat is elected in 2020; a second Trump term or Republican administration in 2021 would likely bring about the end of a woman’s right to privacy, the right of gay Americans to marry, and the right of immigrants to due process of the law.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's just for starters. earthside Dec 2016 #1
Many of the people caring to overturn this do not even have the name correct CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #2
Lisa Bloom also talked about increased difficulty in getting birth control csziggy Dec 2016 #3
There is already what's called an "underground railroad" for women seeking abortion ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #4
I hope they do this honestly Calculating Dec 2016 #5
You hope women's lives are sacrificed to mAybe help turn things around? bettyellen Dec 2016 #14
Not with the current Supreme Court, no. J_William_Ryan Dec 2016 #6
I was amazed to see recent poll results vi5 Dec 2016 #7
As currently constituted, there is a pro-Roe majority on the Court. tritsofme Dec 2016 #8
Yep. Roe v. Wade is going nowhere. n/t duffyduff Dec 2016 #9
Yes talking heads are dismayed why they didn't step down during Obama's years so he could of TrekLuver Dec 2016 #11
Pride always goes before a fall. tritsofme Dec 2016 #12
They should of went for the sure thing for the good of the country. Very selfish. n/t TrekLuver Dec 2016 #13
Considering how they blocked everything Obama did I don't think we bettyellen Dec 2016 #15
If they dare try to overturn this and make it illegal in all 50 states there will be an uproar TrekLuver Dec 2016 #10
There should have been many an uproar over the restrictions that have been put in place in many Stat katmondoo Dec 2016 #16
The wildcard here is Chief Justice Roberts cbdo2007 Dec 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Morning Joy right now: "R...»Reply #6