General Discussion

Owlet

(1,248 posts)

16. That's pretty much what analysts were saying on Tweety last night

Thu Dec 29, 2011, 05:30 AM

Dec 2011

Made sense when I heard it then. As usual, I can't remember the arguments that led to the conclusion. As far as Nebraska goes, Nelson wasn't much of a Dem to begin with, but the (D) after his name did matter in the overall count for majority. I dunno: I just have a really bad feeling about the Senate and House races in general. Two (or four) more years of gridlock and it's pretty much 'game over' for this country.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats can not afford to lose the Senate [View all] jaysunb Dec 2011 OP

My prediction as of tonight. RandySF Dec 2011 #1

I Don't Believe Montana, Missouri or Nebraska Will Switch to the Dark Side mckara Dec 2011 #2

Who will save Nebraska? RandySF Dec 2011 #3

a net 2 sounds about right Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #4

Which combination do you see happening? RandySF Dec 2011 #5

kinda far out to be as specific as you have been Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #6

Running the table RandySF Dec 2011 #10

Wisconsin will be a tough run, too. Go Baldwin!! PeaceNikki Dec 2011 #9

+2 for Republicans still keeps us in the slim majority. LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #14

That's pretty much what analysts were saying on Tweety last night Owlet Dec 2011 #16

Jon Tester certainly can win, even if Obama loses. Dawson Leery Dec 2011 #7

Why would they lose the Senate? nt Zorra Dec 2011 #8

We have an important primary in Hawaii RandySF Dec 2011 #11

I'm backing Mazie... ellisonz Dec 2011 #17

I don't see us winning back the House. edhopper Dec 2011 #12

k&r... spanone Dec 2011 #13

Agreed Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2011 #15

You either stand for something or you stand for nothing... ellisonz Dec 2011 #18

Rec'd treestar Dec 2011 #19