General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]dawg
(10,777 posts)I do believe Hillary would have had a better first-term than President Obama has had. There isn't much difference in the two ideologically, but I think Hillary had a better grasp of what she would be up against and the futility of seeking compromise with people who are fundamentally irrational.
But at this point, with President Obama's entire administration already in place, and the steep learning curve that he has already had to climb, I don't think so. Hillary would have to re-invent the wheel in too many ways to make her first administration better than what President Obama is likely to accomplish in his second.
The only thing I really like about this idea (thought-experiment, really) is that it would allow for an Obama - Clinton - Obama twelve-year control of the White House, which is a thought that makes me smile a little. I fear that Mrs. Clinton will consider herself too old to run in 2016, which is a pity, because I think she would be a good president.