General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Biden has proven to be a poor choice for VP [View all]SixthSense
(829 posts)He brought political experience that Obama didn't have, and specifically foreign policy experience, which Obama didn't have at all.
A VP is supposed to be in the background - the office has only one power of consequence under the Constitution (chairing the Senate), and other than that the person has no job other than to step in to the Presidency as an alternate.
A VP who was more active would make it more difficult to perform his primary role. Ideally you want a VP who hasn't pissed anybody off so that if a transition does need to be made it can be done smoothly. If your VP is an active political combatant then he will have much more difficultly pulling the country together in the wake of a disabled or deceased President.
The other thing you want in a VP is that he doesn't look like a more attractive option to anybody than keeping the current President. I used to refer to Dan Quayle as life insurance, back in the day.