Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

calimary

(83,444 posts)

38. Yeah, unfortunately. That sounds like a very reasonable concern to me.

Reply to MountainFool (Reply #28)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 12:09 PM

Jan 2017

And the CONS are all so thrilled and relieved that they "won" (OR I'd submit the more accurate verb here is "STOLE&quot the White House back that they'll do anything to sustain that status.

They've been dying to get the White House back, especially with a stooge installed at the top, who, as their anti-tax "god" Grover Norquist has said, only needs to know how to hold a pen - to sign whatever they put in front of him. I was gratified to see a clip of him at a podium talking about that very thing, played on either CNN or MSNBC in the last couple of days.

CONNECT THE DOTS.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CIA folks are worried if they find dirt on Putin & tell Trump-Trump will blow up their source's spot [View all] kpete Jan 2017 OP

K & R n/t TubbersUK Jan 2017 #1

another revoltin' development Repubs have gotten us into . . annabanana Jan 2017 #2

God get the red out Jan 2017 #3

Holy shit, fun n serious Jan 2017 #4

Chances are that the reason we didn't hear about the Russians months ago... Sancho Jan 2017 #5

Frightening get the red out Jan 2017 #6

crap bdamomma Jan 2017 #7

The CIA will trap him greymattermom Jan 2017 #8

from your lips to foggy bottom. mopinko Jan 2017 #18

Nice. DK504 Jan 2017 #20

Trump is a honeypot away from scandal. TeamPooka Jan 2017 #22

Yeah. And it's probably his own daughter. tenorly Jan 2017 #29

No but he will ignore and we'll have another 9/11 style attack hollowdweller Jan 2017 #31

Espionage is easier to convict than treason jmowreader Jan 2017 #32

You just say "no." McCamy Taylor Jan 2017 #9

This is troubling because it is a Presidents organization but, Jim Beard Jan 2017 #10

We need to hope that we have heroes on the inside today. Nt retrowire Jan 2017 #11

Any source that is outed with undoubtedly fall off the face of the earth. TheBlackAdder Jan 2017 #12

Not just the source. Will Trump hand over the agents too? Eugene Jan 2017 #13

It's frightening to think of the CIA turning on a US President. drm604 Jan 2017 #14

He's not my President world wide wally Jan 2017 #16

+1 blueseas Jan 2017 #26

Uh, yeah, CIA vs The Prez is kind of a scary idea, ya' think? nikto Jan 2017 #36

Where's James Bond when we fucking need him? world wide wally Jan 2017 #15

I'm so there with you. I was watching a show on Hitler last night. woodsprite Jan 2017 #17

They're the fucking CIA. KPN Jan 2017 #19

Can't they provide documentation, recordings without revealing the source? chowder66 Jan 2017 #21

KnR Hekate Jan 2017 #23

CIA should do what he would do, just lie. lark Jan 2017 #24

Spies like us blueseas Jan 2017 #25

MI6 and Mossad will be cautious with what they share during Trumps tenure. sarcasmo Jan 2017 #27

Altho I can see Mossad being a string-puller also erronis Jan 2017 #39

loss of human int ... MountainFool Jan 2017 #28

Yeah, unfortunately. That sounds like a very reasonable concern to me. calimary Jan 2017 #38

This is precisely why he's not fit to be president BainsBane Jan 2017 #30

Jesus. spanone Jan 2017 #33

CIA should finger Putin's allies in russia regardless of source so when Vlad's plant TeamPooka Jan 2017 #34

I thought the CIA ALREADY HAD evidence nikto Jan 2017 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author AgadorSparticus Jan 2017 #37

Guess we may find more confidence about the JFK assassination jeanmarc Jan 2017 #40