Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,903 posts)
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 08:53 AM Feb 2017

"The Other Bombshell in Flynn Story: Contacts with Russia during the campaign" [View all]

News stories and headlines overnight are focused on the revelation that Michael Flynn discussed sanctions with Russia’s Ambassador in December phone calls, which flatly contradicts what Vice President Pence, White House Spokesman Sean Spicer, and Flynn himself had previously publicly asserted. The story, broken by Greg Miller, Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima at the Washington Post, contains a potentially even more explosive revelation: Russian contacts with Donald Trump’s inner circle during the presidential campaign, an allegation that the Trump administration has also previously categorically denied.

..............


III. The New Revelations

Last night’s Washington Post story itself is primarily focused on Flynn’s December phone calls. Nonetheless, the Post also states, in passing: “The talks were part of a series of contacts between Flynn and (Ambassador] Kislyak that began before the Nov. 8 election and continued during the transition, officials said.”

The Post notes that Vice President Pence made two assertions—one dealing with the December calls and the other “a more sweeping assertion, saying there had been no contact between members of Trump’s team and Russia during the campaign.” The Post then writes:

Neither of those assertions is consistent with the fuller account of Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak provided by officials who had access to reports from U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies that routinely monitor the communications of Russian diplomats. Nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters
.

The Post also writes that the Russian Ambassador recently remarked on contacts prior to the election:

“Kislyak said that he had been in contact with Flynn since before the election, but declined to answer questions about the subjects they discussed.”



Way more:
https://www.justsecurity.org/37630/bombshell-flynn-story-contacts-russia-campaign-russian-hacking/

and this:

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To me that's THE bombshell. That's what makes this the biggest treasonous act against Squinch Feb 2017 #1
I saw that clip of the handshake. Pence didn't even look at Flynn... brush Feb 2017 #2
Yes, but Flynn could destroy Trump if he talks. Don't count your chickens on that "on his way out" Trust Buster Feb 2017 #3
I don't think they need him to talk. They've got the goods on him and much more. brush Feb 2017 #6
And, by "they" you mean the Sessions' Justice Department ? Trust Buster Feb 2017 #7
Of course not. When you've got the Washington Post and New York Times... brush Feb 2017 #13
John Mitchell's Justice Department gummed up the dorks for years. I think Mitchell will look like Trust Buster Feb 2017 #14
Media outlets don't work for the trump admin. brush Feb 2017 #15
Media outlets have limited news cycles in todays digital world. Time is our enemy. Right wing news Trust Buster Feb 2017 #16
Ahhh... what's up? You sound like you want the story to go away. brush Feb 2017 #18
No, I'm just speaking to the reality that now exists in this country. For every media personality Trust Buster Feb 2017 #19
trump got 42% of the 50% of the people who actually voted, which translates ... brush Feb 2017 #21
I will resist as well. But, that has nothing to do with a Sessions Justice Department and a Trust Buster Feb 2017 #22
Pls get off that. Sessions and his DOJ are not all-powerful, just as Mitchell's wasn't brush Feb 2017 #23
Uh, yes they are that powerful. If this country wanted Democrats calling the shots, they would Trust Buster Feb 2017 #24
Apparent realities have a way of changing. Remember the much needed autopsy the repugs... brush Feb 2017 #25
Kind of snarky. I will resist either the best of them. Acknowledging the Republicans strength to Trust Buster Feb 2017 #26
Regarding the repugs and their allegedly all-powerful position... brush Feb 2017 #30
You ignore that the election was illegitimate it seems triron Feb 2017 #27
If Flynn is on his way out, what about Trumputin who gave the order? wordpix Feb 2017 #10
Let us not forget that Trump's dirty trickster, Roger Stone, tweeted on Aug. 21 that the Podesta Trust Buster Feb 2017 #4
Yep. dalton99a Feb 2017 #17
Let's see how long it takes for Republicans to speak out against this in-house traitor. democrank Feb 2017 #5
and it's the Grand Oligarchy Party we're talkin about wordpix Feb 2017 #29
Kick Cracklin Charlie Feb 2017 #8
keep that slow burn going--more info is bound to come out fishwax Feb 2017 #9
ready for a huge conflagration myself wordpix Feb 2017 #11
if it comes out after the midterms, it could be President Pelosi fishwax Feb 2017 #12
Pence knew malaise Feb 2017 #20
Pense DittoTheCat2 Feb 2017 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The Other Bombshell in F...