Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 08:48 PM Dec 2011

All-time record high temperature recorded at South Pole [View all]

http://amrc.ssec.wisc.edu/blog/2011/12/29/update-on-record-high-temperatures-at-south-pole-and-aws-sites/

Here is an update on the South Pole and nearby Nico and Henry Automatic Weather Stations (AWS) record high temperatures recorded on 25 December 2011:

• The prior record high temperature at South Pole was recorded on 27 December 1978, not on 12 December 1978, as misquoted in some sources.

• Preliminary assessment of the record high at Nico AWS was -8.2C or 17.2F on 25 December 2011. This breaks the previous known record of -13.9C or 7F recorded on 4 January 2010.

• Preliminary assessment of the record high at Henry AWS was -8.9C or 16F on 25 December 2011. This break the previous known record of -14.5C or 5.9F on 5 January 2010.
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But ,NO it's a normal cycle. n/t orpupilofnature57 Dec 2011 #1
Facts have a well-known liberal bias. Science is Socialism. Etc, etc... nt onehandle Dec 2011 #2
NOT good, NOT good derby378 Dec 2011 #3
I don't know about Kilimanjaro, but the upper rurallib Dec 2011 #5
I was on top of Kilimanjaro five years ago (in August). former9thward Dec 2011 #17
Wow... derby378 Dec 2011 #29
It was. former9thward Dec 2011 #34
yikes... FirstLight Dec 2011 #4
This is meaningless happyslug Dec 2011 #6
Temperatures ON the pole can go up more before that ice melts mindwalker_i Dec 2011 #7
I am curious about your statements... xocet Dec 2011 #8
My point was the temperature at the pole is much less important then temperatures elsewhere happyslug Dec 2011 #12
Thanks for your detailed response. It is appreciated. xocet Dec 2011 #13
No, I just read a lot and have been concerned about this for over ten years happyslug Dec 2011 #16
In the dead of winter here in northern MI 17 isn't too bad JNelson6563 Dec 2011 #11
I gotta agree. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #55
Looks like 2012 will be as hot if not hotter than 2010. Definitely in top 5 hottest years. joshcryer Dec 2011 #9
How much ya got? Edweird Dec 2011 #20
How much you willing to risk? joshcryer Dec 2011 #21
Risk? There's no risk on my part. Edweird Dec 2011 #23
Ahh, so you would dismiss the GISS temperature record if 2012 was in the 5th hottest on that record. joshcryer Dec 2011 #26
You are aware that the Earth is roughly 500,000,000 years old, correct? Edweird Dec 2011 #27
Ahh, yes. It's clear I am discussing the instrumental temperature record. joshcryer Dec 2011 #28
The OP says "all-time" and yours says the 'top 5' - both of which are incorrect. Edweird Dec 2011 #30
But, I never intended your intepretion, and neither did the OP. And you know that. joshcryer Dec 2011 #32
What bet? You mean the one where I showed that we are nowhere near "All-time" highs? Edweird Jan 2012 #35
You're dismissing the instrumental temperature record. Should I even continue this with you? joshcryer Jan 2012 #36
How long have instruments been around? How long has the Earth existed? Edweird Jan 2012 #38
Ahh, my friend. This is too easy. Your graph "starts" at 1950 (+95 year delay). joshcryer Jan 2012 #39
So? That changes the preceding 10,500 years in what way? Edweird Jan 2012 #40
The Holoscene was relatively stable. joshcryer Jan 2012 #44
You're having a real hard time accepting geological history. Edweird Jan 2012 #45
Haha, now you're using hundred thousand year variance. How far back do you want to go? joshcryer Jan 2012 #46
The blue link is the 10,000 year record, but here it is a 3rd time. Edweird Jan 2012 #47
That's a 3C variance. Compared to the 100ky variance, that is stable. joshcryer Jan 2012 #48
It's not stable. Edweird Jan 2012 #49
Ahh, so you agree temperature rise of a mere 2.0C would be catastrophic. joshcryer Jan 2012 #50
Pope Innocent VIII was wrong, and so are you. Edweird Jan 2012 #51
So what do you think the CO2 is doing? Is there a mechanism to equal out the *physical*... joshcryer Jan 2012 #52
Dude, get real. In the grand scheme of things we aren't squat. Edweird Jan 2012 #58
We put more excess CO2 into the atmosphere than all natural sources. joshcryer Jan 2012 #60
Wow, sarcastic I see. Logical Dec 2011 #31
The Earth is 500 million years old? You're off by an order of magnitude. TheWraith Jan 2012 #37
At least he didn't say 6,000. He's got that goin' for him. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2012 #41
That was, unfortunately, 'off the cuff'. Edweird Jan 2012 #42
Yeah, my bad. Edweird Jan 2012 #43
So if you're so wrong about that, what else might you be wrong about? TheWraith Jan 2012 #53
By all means, go over it with a fine toothed comb. Edweird Jan 2012 #57
I assume you're holding yourself to the same standard. Edweird Jan 2012 #59
Scrapitalism. Kids there isn't a Santa, and there soon will be no north pole either. lonestarnot Dec 2011 #10
Good news for Santa. MilesColtrane Dec 2011 #14
"All time"? I don't believe that's remotely accurate. Edweird Dec 2011 #15
not just broken, but broken by ~10 degrees? Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #18
But... but... it's snowing in Michigan! There's no climate change! Fawke Em Dec 2011 #19
Not in southeast Michigan. marmar Dec 2011 #25
Well WE have snow! DeathToTheOil Dec 2011 #22
Sobering. marmar Dec 2011 #24
but...but...but CLIMATEGATE!!!!11 jpak Dec 2011 #33
Was Polar Temperature Increases Predicted? Dirty Socialist Jan 2012 #54
What does this have to do with Glenn Greenwald? DeathToTheOil Jan 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All-time record high temp...