Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,911 posts)

5. Is that the last one he actually paid something due to the 18yr write-off from his "loss"?

Wed Mar 15, 2017, 07:48 AM

Mar 2017

I was thinking maybe that was why it was the 2005 return.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Re: Rachel and the tax returns...both things could be true [View all] Chitown Kev Mar 2017 OP

Because he is a dick and has us right were he wants us. Doreen Mar 2017 #2

but why are his tax returns from 2005 even relevant? Skittles Mar 2017 #4

I want to see his returns from after he started colluding with Russia Skittles Mar 2017 #6