General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So What is A Good Conservative? [View all]RZM
(8,556 posts)Note that of the four people voting to leave the post alone, only one bothered to say why.
So because the jury didn't go my way, I'm supposed to bow out of the discussion then? Just because 4 out of 6 randomly selected DUers don't agree with me doesn't mean that I should refrain from speaking my mind.
At Thu Dec 29, 2011, 07:31 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
More or less advocacy of violence, albeit in a subtle way. I don't think this kind of thing has a place on DU.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Thu Dec 29, 2011, 07:48 PM, and voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: I was on the fence with this one, as I don't think the poster is intending to advocate violence against anyone, but I do see how it could be taken that way. I think it is better to be safe than sorry with something like this.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: For one, this is a slight paraphrase and an accurate one, imo. Please place these types of responses in CONTEXT.
The poster is NOT advocating violence on any level. Lighten up folks, this post is appropriate.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: I agree with the person alerting on this thread. We shouldn't stoop to FR levels.