General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Declare the last election null and void [View all]forgotmylogin
(7,520 posts)I was drawing a parallel by reduction. I said I understood your point.
Laws are updated and modified and changed. 45 certainly has no problem with doing so where it suits him.
I was pointing out that even though there isn't precedent, that it would be possible to set a precedent legally. There are many laws that had to evolve when new situations crop up. Probably when the first cars came out, there was no precedent for a 55mph speed limit because model Ts probably didn't push 30. Just because there is no precedent in no way disallows one from being set. New precedent is set in legal decisions all the time.
While I agree the chances of this are low, my speculation wasn't intended to cause you to throw down your clipboard and leave the room just because you don't agree.