Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jackass Radicals can't discuss Alex Jones threats against Schiff without criticizing Schiff and more [View all]LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)14. "I really wish people would stop comparing and contrasting two demographics over here..."
"I really wish people would stop comparing and contrasting two demographics over here..."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jackass Radicals can't discuss Alex Jones threats against Schiff without criticizing Schiff and more [View all]
stevenleser
Apr 2017
OP
No surprise to me. That site has had a pro-45/anti-Dem element for several months now.
LonePirate
Apr 2017
#1
Some of it IS here. I don't know why you think there is some magical separation.
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#8
"I really wish people would stop comparing and contrasting two demographics over here..."
LanternWaste
Apr 2017
#14
Update: Now there is a response to at least one of the filibuster OPs criticizing Democrats
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#7
If Adam Schiff hadn't been truthful about "More than circumstantial", the Republicans would have
OnDoutside
Apr 2017
#32
Jackass Radicals are Russian bots & Trolls, or haven't you figured that out yet?
bobalew
Apr 2017
#31
So your response to craziness from JPR is to use the whataboutism logical fallacy?
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#34
No, it's not. Your attempt to frame it as such is a logical fallacy and thus invalid. nt
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#39
No you are attempting to derail and deflect with a logical fallacy. Address the JPR OP. nt
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#47
P.S. thank you for kicking my thread I enjoy seeing the subject "Jackass Radicals"
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#40
Every damn one of them at JACKASS RADICALS are traitors and should be treated as such.
William769
Apr 2017
#45