Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Warpy

(114,525 posts)

24. I'm not absolutey certain I would, either

Reply to KittyWampus (Reply #20)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 02:27 PM

Apr 2017

That region is suck a complete clusterfuck that "solid evidence" can't be trusted.

When say I think he's the likely culprit, I say it with about a 75% certainty. That other 25% would be too high for me to go shooting missiles at him without NATO, Congressional, or UN approval.

Perhaps she doesn't express herself clearly. Or perhaps she's a kneejerk Assad supporter who's secretly lusting after Putin's body. Personally, I'll go with the former since I've seen enough of his body in his publicity photos to have serious doubts about the latter.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tulsi Gabard appears to be defending Assad [View all] Chevy Apr 2017 OP

Dear CNN: if I see Tulsi Gabbard being interviewed.... LisaM Apr 2017 #1

Vomit inducing BannonsLiver Apr 2017 #11

why is anything on CNN worth watching. JCanete Apr 2017 #12

What tv news channels are worth watching in your view? oberliner Apr 2017 #18

I was being admitedly over the top. I don't think CNN is good. I will sometimes watch it because JCanete Apr 2017 #23

Understood oberliner Apr 2017 #29

I think Chris Hayes and Rachel are okay. It has been a while since I've watched, but I've JCanete Apr 2017 #33

O'Donnell is still on oberliner Apr 2017 #34

She's always opposed his removal via US intervention Warpy Apr 2017 #2

she is denying he used chemical weapons. one doesn't have to support his removal JI7 Apr 2017 #3

Oh, I think he was most likely responsible, but no one can be certain Warpy Apr 2017 #4

we know he did it. JI7 Apr 2017 #5

He's winning the war, why would they use chemical warfare now? killbotfactory Apr 2017 #7

They aren't winning the war and trump doesnt give a shit JI7 Apr 2017 #13

Great...so ISIS can seize them if we "take out" Assad? Do people think beyond their own noses? anneboleyn Apr 2017 #8

Then you know more than most of the intelligence outfits in the world. Warpy Apr 2017 #9

If asked if she was presented with solid evidence she said she STILL wouldn't accept his culpability KittyWampus Apr 2017 #20

I'm not absolutey certain I would, either Warpy Apr 2017 #24

I'm glad she opposes Trump's strikes against the Syrian state. David__77 Apr 2017 #6

Who gives a shit if you're "skeptical"? I mean really.. Cha Apr 2017 #10

She is being referred to as alt-Michelle Bachmann on Twitter. N/T Chevy Apr 2017 #14

Really! good to know.. I have a special Cha Apr 2017 #16

She delivered a message from trump to assas tikka Apr 2017 #15

Nazi Richard Spencer endorses her for 2020 N/T Chevy Apr 2017 #17

Seriously? OMG that's the kiss of death. VOX Apr 2017 #32

Ugh! It would benefit her if she were to sharpen her critical thinking skills. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #19

It would benefit the Democratic party to be rid of her. KittyWampus Apr 2017 #21

She could kiss Assad on the lips and tell him where to gas... SaschaHM Apr 2017 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author ismnotwasm Apr 2017 #25

She is not to be trusted. Ever. randome Apr 2017 #26

Evan McMullin calls out Gabbard Chevy Apr 2017 #27

Some tweets say that she is a Trump mole HoneyBadger Apr 2017 #28

Recall when HRC campaign was hacked by Chevy Apr 2017 #30

Did you read that on the internet? TSIAS Apr 2017 #31