Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)

7. The study co-authored by a law professor?

Reply to former9thward (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 14, 2017, 09:10 AM

Apr 2017

"But a new study, co-authored by Northwestern Law professor Tonja Jacobi, suggests it might be more familiar than you’d think."

No one argued that there weren't interruptions. What was studied was the number of interruptions based on sex of the Justice, and with enough data that should be a fairly easy thing to "prove."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Female Justices are interrupted 3x more than their male colleagues [View all] Tanuki Apr 2017 OP

That's probably true greymattermom Apr 2017 #1

A story that is trying to generate faux outrage and is doing that. former9thward Apr 2017 #2

You can excuse it all you want, but it is consistent with decades of research and observation Tanuki Apr 2017 #3

I am commenting on the Supreme Court. former9thward Apr 2017 #11

Yours are some rather creative allegations... though lacking objective evidence to support them LanternWaste Apr 2017 #4

The study co-authored by a law professor? Nevernose Apr 2017 #7

You're adorable. RedWedge Apr 2017 #10

These threads are always enlightening. JTFrog Apr 2017 #5

Yep Pacifist Patriot Apr 2017 #6

No kidding. LisaM Apr 2017 #9

I call BS Orrex Apr 2017 #8

it is true everywhere niyad Apr 2017 #12

I'm not surprised. Kentonio Apr 2017 #13