Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)

5. By far the number of progressive and liberals who chose not to vote

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Fri Apr 14, 2017, 07:47 PM

Apr 2017

Or voted third party because they couldn't support the lesser of 2 evils but had no problem with their actions allowing true evil to come to Washington....A disgrace.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Biggest Disappointment from the Nov Election? [View all] busterbrown Apr 2017 OP

They had the odds at 71.4% vs 28.6% aidbo Apr 2017 #1

Yea... Not based on facts. busterbrown Apr 2017 #4

Based on their simulations. Which were based on aggregate polling numbers aidbo Apr 2017 #6

So i suggest that 538 does it own polling from now on.. busterbrown Apr 2017 #7

Polling costs a lot of money. LisaL Apr 2017 #9

Yea and he probably made a ton of money busterbrown Apr 2017 #10

What I'm trying to explain is that their methodology did work, to an extent. aidbo Apr 2017 #11

The people on the ballots. elehhhhna Apr 2017 #2

Unless the machines were hacked marlakay Apr 2017 #3

By far the number of progressive and liberals who chose not to vote beachbum bob Apr 2017 #5

Some people don't appear to understand probabilities. LisaL Apr 2017 #8

We're angry at Nate Silver? Shandris Apr 2017 #12

Liberals who fail to vote. Sarandonites. Steiners Stinky The Clown Apr 2017 #13