Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
11. What I'm trying to explain is that their methodology did work, to an extent.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 08:59 PM
Apr 2017
Professionals (538) had the odds deep towards Trump’s Defeat?

No. 538 had the odds of Trump winning at nearly 1 in 3 which are decidedly not "deep towards Trump's Defeat".

There was, in my opinion, a general belief that Hillary 'had it in the bag'. That in itself could have (I stress could have) depressed turnout enough to put Trump over the edge in those three states that ended up making all the difference in the Electoral College. Only something like 77,000 votes more for Trump combined in MI, WI, and PA. Polling data is also suspect these days and their prediction models are only as good as the data that go into them.

I don't know a better way to put this to you, but I just don't think 538's prediction was as far off as you seem to believe it was.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Biggest Disappointmen...»Reply #11