Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tom Rinaldo

(23,181 posts)
10. It's a complaint about critisism of Tim Kain's prior record in Virginia
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 09:20 AM
Apr 2017

On at least one other thread I know of, one I started, this story was linked to:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/26/why-tim-kaine-can-oppose-abortion-and-still-run-with-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f57abf8cbf06

The "money quotes" from that article concerned Kaine' PAST record in Virginia:

"Eleven years ago, as he ran for governor of Virginia, Tim Kaine made clear his stance on abortion: “I have a faith-based opposition,” he wrote on his campaign’s website. “I will work in good faith to reduce abortions.”

Kaine went on to laud adoption as the best solution to an unwanted pregnancy. He promoted abstinence-only sex education (and later slashed funding to the program, citing research that found it wasn’t effective). He authorized the sale of “Choose Life” license plates to fund religious counseling clinics that discouraged abortion. He backed Virginia’s “informed consent” law, which requires women seeking the procedure to undergo medically unnecessary ultrasounds."

My own reply to the person who posted that link at the time was:

"Out of the examples listed in those paragraphs this is the one that bothers me:

"He backed Virginia’s “informed consent” law, which requires women seeking the procedure to undergo medically unnecessary ultrasounds."

I accept that he has his own moral views and I don't so much mind those who work to make adoption work as a choice. But authorizing “Choose Life” license plates to fund religious counseling clinics that discouraged abortion." is also problematic to me. In general though I accept the word of those who say he has voted to support a woman's right to choose."


In, hindsight I regret that I did not clarify more what I meant when I wrote: "I don't so much mind those who work to make adoption work..." Clearly I, at least, was not attacking those who do. My slight ambivalence (I don't so much mind ) comes only from the fact that many of those who do that combine it with religious instruction and guidance against abortion. The news story gives the impression that such was the case in this instance.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My (supposedly anti-abort...»Reply #10