Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PSA: "would of", "could of", "should of", "might of" are meaningless phrases. [View all]Bucky
(55,334 posts)25. less than and fewer than are both acceptable
depending on the circumstance
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
PSA: "would of", "could of", "should of", "might of" are meaningless phrases. [View all]
eppur_se_muova
Apr 2017
OP
It must be great reading Japanese Mystery Novels, you always know who did it first. n/t
PoliticAverse
Apr 2017
#10
The circumstances to use one or the other are specific and EASY to remember.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2017
#34
If you like people, for the verb use "serve" for people and "service" for machinery
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2017
#38
I saw a sign at the March for Science that said "Eppur se muova". I had to ask
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2017
#41
Pet Peeve: "defiantly" when, bless their little hearts, they mean "definitely"
BamaRefugee
Apr 2017
#47
Actually, as a former English teacher, I know all the above. Clearly, the poster was not
WinkyDink
Apr 2017
#76
How to get "its" and "it's" right: NO Possessive Pronoun takes an apostrophe. We don't write "her's,
WinkyDink
Apr 2017
#60
Heh ... you had to mention the Simpsons: "Marge! I'm going over to the Flanderes's ! nt
eppur_se_muova
Apr 2017
#81