Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(90,181 posts)
63. Yeah, as I recalled, she discussed some of her ideas.
Tue May 2, 2017, 06:58 PM
May 2017

Pointing out, for example, that in "coal country," because of the global energy dynamics, coal is declining as a viable resource as other energy sources, especially green ones, are on the rise. Therefore, those coal jobs won't be coming back, as she pointed out - and remember how she got booed for that? That single tiny clip that was pulled and replayed ad nauseam, taken completely out of context. Remember that? It was PART of a longer comment such that BECAUSE those jobs won't be coming back, because the market for the product of those jobs is drying up, our emphasis has to be to look at what other kinds of 21st-century energy resources might be brought into that "coal country" labor market. As in, what else can we bring in, for them to do? What other kinds of jobs can we bring in or develop in that very area?

But nobody bothered with that part of her comment. It was so much sexier and controversial and provocative to use just the she-sure-sounds-cold-hearted part.

She's spent years on various kinds of "listening tours" whether it was for state-wide office (Senator from New York) or nationally - either on her husband's campaigns or her own. She's heard from the people themselves what they want and need and care about and worry over. Her instinct, as I've observed since 1992, is - when you identify a problem, and study it, that's when you can figure up SOMETHING to do about it. Of one kind or other. Finding SOME common ground that allows you to work with opponents and bring them in on things.

She did this over and over and over again. As Senator, as First Lady (of Arkansas and then of the US), as presidential candidate, and internationally as Secretary of State. She did the research, and the leg work. She was willing to get down into the weeds to figure out solutions and find answers by mastering the details, and shape policies accordingly. She did it when people were initially hostile to her. She was an outsider TWICE. Once, when she arrived in Little Rock Arkansas as a Yankee girl from Chicago and Yale in Connecticut, to build a life with local boy Bill Clinton. A second time, she was a new resident of New York, after eight years as First Lady in Washington DC, and seemingly everybody in New York called her a carpet-bagger. Um... until they voted for her, not once but twice.

I so badly wanted those brains in the Oval Office. I still do. I wanted those brains to get to work on our problems, big and small.

Such a loss. Even to those who'll never appreciate it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Someone who can govern-not the glamour goons delisen May 2017 #1
that's really all I wanted. JHan May 2017 #77
Sigh Me. May 2017 #2
Yeah ismnotwasm May 2017 #3
My president lunamagica May 2017 #4
+++ agree iluvtennis May 2017 #31
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one May 2017 #33
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ leftofcool May 2017 #45
Hear, hear!!!! Beacool May 2017 #75
+ a bajillion!!!!!! BlueMTexpat May 2017 #79
The legitimate president for us all. (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #82
MADAM PRESIDENT niyad May 2017 #5
Kicked and recced. (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #6
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #7
You can watch the interview for yourself - someone just posted it in the Video Multimedia Forum. JHan May 2017 #8
Hillary Girl powers May 2017 #9
Welcome to DU, Girl powers. calimary May 2017 #50
Me too! LoveMyCali May 2017 #65
You'll ache. From deep in the heart. The sense of "what might have been" will be excruciating. calimary May 2017 #67
She amazes me LoveMyCali May 2017 #68
She was amazing nt lillypaddle May 2017 #10
Let's take this moment to remind ourselves that she beat Dolt 45 by 3 million votes. caballojm May 2017 #11
Welcome to DU caballojm. calimary May 2017 #51
What a tragic loss of opportunity Nonhlanhla May 2017 #12
I am STILL so BlueMTexpat May 2017 #80
That is so far above tRump's head that he doesn't even hear the Whoosh. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #13
Sadly I don't think he even knows what AI is. JHan May 2017 #29
AI...no way he knows what it is...and the real disgusting thing, he doesn't care to learn.GAH iluvtennis May 2017 #32
lmao, i'm still mad at her for her campaign but i would vote okieinpain May 2017 #14
and.. JHan May 2017 #30
thank you for admitting her campaign was frustrating. n/t. okieinpain May 2017 #64
well I've found many political campaigns frustrating at times. JHan May 2017 #66
+1 brer cat May 2017 #72
The CNN headline has "Hillary blames herself...(and Russia, Comey, etc)" - that disappoints me. NRaleighLiberal May 2017 #15
CNN can go f*** themselves... llmart May 2017 #23
I have cable but refuse to watch the garbage that is CNN.nt jrthin May 2017 #62
Yes, she was great. A refreshing change from what we got instead. KPN May 2017 #16
however UT_democrat May 2017 #17
lol JHan May 2017 #27
She could have at least mentioned the Bowling Green Massacre leftofcool May 2017 #48
Welcome to DU, UT_democrat! calimary May 2017 #52
Madam President elmac May 2017 #18
She was fantastic. I think she should wait to publish Ilsa May 2017 #19
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #20
As far as I know, the Amish are the last holdouts using horse and buggy. nt fleabiscuit May 2017 #22
if Democrats don't get a hold on the truth of it, JHan May 2017 #26
Could be, at least HRC and Dems in general acknowledge automation and robots. fleabiscuit May 2017 #35
Obama addressed it in his farewell speech too. JHan May 2017 #38
UBI is an interesting idea and could be a transition solution to something else. fleabiscuit May 2017 #39
Thing is.. JHan May 2017 #53
And just to add, I like your idea about poets and artists. JHan May 2017 #61
Same goes for you, JHan chade May 2017 #73
I really feel optimistic JHan May 2017 #76
If you disagree with an assessment that's pretty much a given at this point.. JHan May 2017 #24
More Clinton bashing I see. hrmjustin May 2017 #47
Is It Envy , Jealousy? stonecutter357 May 2017 #54
and he started off with a passive aggressive sneer at her attending Yale. JHan May 2017 #59
I continue to cycle through #1-4, but will never reach #5 Acceptance. FK that. nt fleabiscuit May 2017 #21
Always gives me a pit in my stomach to see everything that was thrown at her ffr May 2017 #25
She needs to keep a high profile! Cattledog May 2017 #28
I try to mitigate my political heartaches, but I'll probably never get over her loss. Starry Messenger May 2017 #34
This! BlueMTexpat May 2017 #81
If she were president... DeminPennswoods May 2017 #36
You can't be sure of that. All the Comey and Russian information would still exist. And come out. fleabiscuit May 2017 #41
We'd have likely had the senate too, but yeah the obstruction would be relentless... bettyellen May 2017 #49
I anyone running against DT was president, then this would be the case - but she had the chops ehrnst May 2017 #83
She deserved all our votes and she got them. Warpy May 2017 #37
She ran a crappy campaign, but would have been a GREAT President. n/t Still In Wisconsin May 2017 #40
She figured she had it in the bag and didn't canpaign as hard as she should have Jno_Gilmor_ May 2017 #55
Yup. And specifically, Ignoring Wisconsin and Michigan was idiotic. Still In Wisconsin May 2017 #70
"Brutally incompetent?" ehrnst May 2017 #87
Bullshit. I voted, donated, and campaigned for HRC. The organization of field offices was Still In Wisconsin May 2017 #88
I've been on this board awhile. ehrnst May 2017 #89
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #92
I was just telling you that I have read what you have posted ehrnst May 2017 #94
Hindsight - but really, do we know that she didn't win Michigan? ehrnst May 2017 #85
Still managed to beat her opponents. (nt) ehrnst May 2017 #84
Did she have any solutions for the coming jobless economy? n/t Blue Meany May 2017 #42
She identified some of the challenges JHan May 2017 #44
Well is one that got little attention. She didn't get the coverage for her proposal nor did she nikibatts May 2017 #58
Yeah, as I recalled, she discussed some of her ideas. calimary May 2017 #63
Were you around in 2016? In the US? ehrnst May 2017 #86
I didn't see it and I'm sure I wouldn't be able to bear the sadness. BlancheSplanchnik May 2017 #43
I just finished watching it LoveMyCali May 2017 #69
the only positive is that the situation now is opening a lot of eyes BlancheSplanchnik May 2017 #90
Madam President. calimary May 2017 #46
She is SO smart and could have moved our country forward in so many ways. I will always skylucy May 2017 #56
I'll always be proud of my vote for HRC. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #57
This clip should be a good reminder of the unfathomable contrast betweem the two candidates DFW May 2017 #60
Disappointed that she didn't say Trump owes her voters an apology (the 3mm extra) for calling Laura PourMeADrink May 2017 #71
Intelligence, know-how, grace and aplomb. Beacool May 2017 #74
Mahalo for your report, JH.. Good to Cha May 2017 #78
So they're covering her now... Wow ecstatic May 2017 #91
I hope to see and hear more from her. Sparkly May 2017 #93
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton was just ...»Reply #63