Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

niyad

(130,976 posts)
Wed May 3, 2017, 12:14 PM May 2017

Morford: Male birth control is already here. Guess who's blocking it? [View all]




Male birth control is already here. Guess who’s blocking it?

By Mark Morford on May 1, 2017 at 1:45 PM



The maverick: Professor Sujoy Guha


Women have lots of contraceptive options, none of them very good and all with lots of room for improvement


One simple shot, and it's done. One more, and it's undone.



All your suspicions are probably correct. All your most depressing hunches about capitalism’s true nature usually prove, in many cases, all too true.Shall we sum it up, one more time? It goes something like this:
Just because a brilliant, relatively simple invention would save lives, shift the global paradigm, upend the lopsided, hugely unfair gender/procreation dynamic, help curb global overpopulation and diminish multiple, long-standing cultural and religious stigmas, doesn’t mean capitalism can let it happen. Why? You already know why.

Take, for one fine and telling example: birth control for men. Have you heard? It’s done. It’s ready. It’s safe, it works, it’s simple and easy and extremely affordable and it was invented in rural India by a maverick, 76-year-old biomedical engineer named Sujoy Guha at a tiny, scruffy biomedical startup, because all the big pharma monoliths across the planet have worked very hard to block, halt, stall, balk at researching it for themselves. It’s a tremendous threat, you see, to their female-contraception profits. And, as we are all reminded nearly every single day, capitalism’s No. 1 rule is forever inviolable: No one and nothing – not childbirth, not disease, not the environment, not human health or love or humanitarian progress – nothing f—ks with the bottom line.

Behold, the sad-but-still-hopeful tale of RISUG, (“reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance”), as reported by Bloomberg (though Wired reported on it as far back as 2011). RISUG is a gel that, once injected into a man’s scrotum in a simple, one-time, 15-minute outpatient procedure, stays put for years and knock’s out sperm’s viability, until another simple injection reverses it.It really does appear to be just that simple, just that inspired. And the story of Guha’s invention is one full of bravery and smarts, scrappy industriousness and genuine concern for the fate of humanity.



$3 billion a year in profits, and everyone hates them. RISUG could change everything

Not that you’d know it in the West. Despite RISUG’s obvious, world-altering potential to completely upend the way we think about contraception, population control and who can now take responsibility for what, no major U.S. pharma will go near it. Not because it’s dangerous. Not because it’s untested. Not because it would require relatively little in the way of further clinical trials in U.S. to get it approved. And not only because all U.S. pharma companies are run by rich, middle-aged white guys who are so monstrously limited in imagination, so entirely lacking in, well, balls, they all collectively freak out at the idea of trying to market what amounts to a tiny, one-time needle-shot into their precious man-bits.

. . . .

http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2017/05/01/male-birth-control-is-already-here-guess-whos-blocking-it/#photo-792747
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm sure Fundies HAB911 May 2017 #1
no doubt niyad May 2017 #2
Every sperm is sacred!! /nt hopeforchange2008 May 2017 #3
Damn. volstork May 2017 #39
Molford's premise falls apart when you realize that there are 200,000+ vascetomies performed in the FSogol May 2017 #4
A sperm that gets through and is "highly damaged" likely won't reach the ovum Orrex May 2017 #14
and if it is a male sperm, it won't stop and ask for directions? FSogol May 2017 #24
Probably not, but it's hard to fold a map under those conditions Orrex May 2017 #26
There's a vas deferens between between an injection and surgery Orrex May 2017 #16
Are you channeling Pinboy3niner? MindPilot May 2017 #19
I can only aspire (nt) Orrex May 2017 #29
You really seemed to grasp the problem. You could say you have it by the short hairs. FSogol May 2017 #23
Ha! Freethinker65 May 2017 #28
It's a pretty solid and safe birth control measure. Here is the Wikipedia article about it. StevieM May 2017 #18
Yeah, I skimmed an article about it a month or so ago. Looks promising, but I wouldn't FSogol May 2017 #25
Men do tend to be more..careful about hurting their reproductive parts ismnotwasm May 2017 #5
so very true. niyad May 2017 #6
Awwwwwww... bullsnarfle May 2017 #37
Then who is buying all of the penis and scrotum piercing jewelry? jberryhill May 2017 #43
I am speaking from nursing experience ismnotwasm May 2017 #46
From a public health perspective... jberryhill May 2017 #47
I'd pay Big Money to see American men lining up in droves to get an injection into their scrotums. WillowTree May 2017 #7
as long as i have the concession stand!! niyad May 2017 #8
Deal! WillowTree May 2017 #12
But wouldn't that damage the sacred elixir of male power? enough May 2017 #9
shhhhh niyad May 2017 #10
If men were able nykym May 2017 #11
"if men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament" niyad May 2017 #13
thank you knew I forgot something just got swept up in the moment nykym May 2017 #15
that's okay, the point is correct, no matter how expressed niyad May 2017 #17
If men mercuryblues May 2017 #33
And everyone would be an only child Freddie May 2017 #54
YES niyad May 2017 #56
What we said a long long time ago... countryjake May 2017 #21
Birth control will really come of age when MindPilot May 2017 #20
RW nutters probably think Planned Parenthood Ilsa May 2017 #22
Add it to beer and hot dogs bucolic_frolic May 2017 #27
"Nor is it part of the $3 billion/year disposable condom industry." - yeah because unlike condoms... PoliticAverse May 2017 #30
Unlike condoms, RISUG doesn't protect against STDs meow2u3 May 2017 #32
Politic, maybe that explains the woman with the male escort oldcynic May 2017 #38
Screw big pharma, why doesn't small pharma get on it? IronLionZion May 2017 #31
Kick. Rec. Bookmark. I had no idea this was out there... Hekate May 2017 #34
I'm curious as to why the doctor is holding condoms up as an example of "female contraception". ?? JoeStuckInOH May 2017 #35
I suspect the main thing holding it back is this cstanleytech May 2017 #36
Ever listen to the nykym May 2017 #40
Immaterial to the issue at hand which as of this time it has not won approval to be sold. nt cstanleytech May 2017 #48
Yes, the FDA requires that of regulated drugs... supplements and so on, not so much jberryhill May 2017 #52
That and there is no way for a woman to know a man has/is using it jberryhill May 2017 #44
A wise woman would insist on condom use Mariana May 2017 #51
I could see this being popular with married or long term couples Freddie May 2017 #55
I think it should be injected into newborn infant males. mountain grammy May 2017 #41
I hope this is a joke!!! SwissTony May 2017 #42
Yeah, but I've been thinking of a futuristic story mountain grammy May 2017 #45
It's great the way it works, but what about protection from STD's? madinmaryland May 2017 #49
Most birth control methods do nothing to prevent STD's. Mariana May 2017 #50
The intellectual property rights to RISUG have been acquired for the US by the Parsemus Foundation LongTomH May 2017 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Morford: Male birth cont...