Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Morford: Male birth control is already here. Guess who's blocking it? [View all]
Male birth control is already here. Guess whos blocking it?
By Mark Morford on May 1, 2017 at 1:45 PM

The maverick: Professor Sujoy Guha

Women have lots of contraceptive options, none of them very good and all with lots of room for improvement

One simple shot, and it's done. One more, and it's undone.
All your suspicions are probably correct. All your most depressing hunches about capitalisms true nature usually prove, in many cases, all too true.Shall we sum it up, one more time? It goes something like this:
Just because a brilliant, relatively simple invention would save lives, shift the global paradigm, upend the lopsided, hugely unfair gender/procreation dynamic, help curb global overpopulation and diminish multiple, long-standing cultural and religious stigmas, doesnt mean capitalism can let it happen. Why? You already know why.
Take, for one fine and telling example: birth control for men. Have you heard? Its done. Its ready. Its safe, it works, its simple and easy and extremely affordable and it was invented in rural India by a maverick, 76-year-old biomedical engineer named Sujoy Guha at a tiny, scruffy biomedical startup, because all the big pharma monoliths across the planet have worked very hard to block, halt, stall, balk at researching it for themselves. Its a tremendous threat, you see, to their female-contraception profits. And, as we are all reminded nearly every single day, capitalisms No. 1 rule is forever inviolable: No one and nothing not childbirth, not disease, not the environment, not human health or love or humanitarian progress nothing fks with the bottom line.
Behold, the sad-but-still-hopeful tale of RISUG, (reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance), as reported by Bloomberg (though Wired reported on it as far back as 2011). RISUG is a gel that, once injected into a mans scrotum in a simple, one-time, 15-minute outpatient procedure, stays put for years and knocks out sperms viability, until another simple injection reverses it.It really does appear to be just that simple, just that inspired. And the story of Guhas invention is one full of bravery and smarts, scrappy industriousness and genuine concern for the fate of humanity.

$3 billion a year in profits, and everyone hates them. RISUG could change everything
Not that youd know it in the West. Despite RISUGs obvious, world-altering potential to completely upend the way we think about contraception, population control and who can now take responsibility for what, no major U.S. pharma will go near it. Not because its dangerous. Not because its untested. Not because it would require relatively little in the way of further clinical trials in U.S. to get it approved. And not only because all U.S. pharma companies are run by rich, middle-aged white guys who are so monstrously limited in imagination, so entirely lacking in, well, balls, they all collectively freak out at the idea of trying to market what amounts to a tiny, one-time needle-shot into their precious man-bits.
. . . .
http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2017/05/01/male-birth-control-is-already-here-guess-whos-blocking-it/#photo-792747
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Molford's premise falls apart when you realize that there are 200,000+ vascetomies performed in the
FSogol
May 2017
#4
You really seemed to grasp the problem. You could say you have it by the short hairs.
FSogol
May 2017
#23
It's a pretty solid and safe birth control measure. Here is the Wikipedia article about it.
StevieM
May 2017
#18
Yeah, I skimmed an article about it a month or so ago. Looks promising, but I wouldn't
FSogol
May 2017
#25
I'd pay Big Money to see American men lining up in droves to get an injection into their scrotums.
WillowTree
May 2017
#7
"Nor is it part of the $3 billion/year disposable condom industry." - yeah because unlike condoms...
PoliticAverse
May 2017
#30
I'm curious as to why the doctor is holding condoms up as an example of "female contraception". ??
JoeStuckInOH
May 2017
#35
Immaterial to the issue at hand which as of this time it has not won approval to be sold. nt
cstanleytech
May 2017
#48
Yes, the FDA requires that of regulated drugs... supplements and so on, not so much
jberryhill
May 2017
#52