Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,913 posts)

7. Also, one person of the two has a reputation for being untruthful and it isn't Comey.

Wed May 17, 2017, 12:50 PM

May 2017

The Federal Evidence Code makes that admissible (but not specific incidents of lying; it's complicated.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nobody can prove what was said between Comey and Trump... [View all] kentuck May 2017 OP

A contemporareneous memo written by one party is.proof marylandblue May 2017 #1

Agreed that memo along with sworn testimony is very compelling. Egnever May 2017 #2

Yeah, evidence, not proof. Orsino May 2017 #10

unless Trump really does have some "tapes" 0rganism May 2017 #3

If he's got them, they probably support Comey's summary. CincyDem May 2017 #4

Message deleted by DU the Administrators kentuck May 2017 #5

It's been said Nixon should have destroyed the kairos12 May 2017 #9