Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Bucky
(55,334 posts)41. I liked Sirota in the past in part because he was denouncing people I disliked
Your take makes perfect sense. Maybe as we get older, some of us become more rational and more interested in due process than in the D vs R tribalism.
Booker's sin in sirota's reporting seems to be insufficient purity of bias over rule of law. It's kind of sad when reporters fall into that trap.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why don't you check-out Elleng's excerpt from from the article and see for yourself
emulatorloo
May 2017
#18
Booker is calling for an investigation first. Sirota is also reporting how much $$$ Booker got.
L. Coyote
May 2017
#23
What did he say that sounds like backing off? He says we should get to the bottom
pnwmom
May 2017
#35
Calling for a full investigation and for getting to the bottom of this is now being a paid shill?
SaschaHM
May 2017
#37
David Sirota is WRONG! Booker is NOT "defending" Jared Kushner. Stuff like this....
George II
May 2017
#46