Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tell Me Again Why Higgs Boson is Earth Shattering? [View all]Avalux
(35,015 posts)69. Wow. Ridiculous nonsense, meant to discredit a major scientific breakthrough.
I could write a long post explaining what a "boson" is, how its apparent discovery confirms the Standard Model of particle physics, how it explains the Higgs mechanism, and how 'seeing' this boson in TWO separate, independent experiments, each with at least a 5 sigma signal, verifies its probable existence.
But somehow, I'm not sure you'd find the information useful.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
First you will have to learn a higher order of mathematics than counting on your fingers
hobbit709
Jul 2012
#10
What 4lbs said, plus it may or may not open the door to supersymmetry models.
FarCenter
Jul 2012
#30
The blog comment you've posted goes on to say that the physical world is the product of conciousness
FarCenter
Jul 2012
#34
Give it up. Just the notion of something named "Higgs Bosun" is cool. Don't poop on the party.
yellowcanine
Jul 2012
#38
"Idealism" works well in the rectory or university study; "materialism" works better elsewhere
FarCenter
Jul 2012
#51
LOL-- I love it when mystical nitwits try to claim science just hasn't "caught up" to them.
Marr
Jul 2012
#50
Maybe they're looking for an even more fundamental and hard to detect particle.
ryan_cats
Jul 2012
#52
I suppose a few "I don't understand this therefore it's wrong" posts were inevitable.. (nt)
Posteritatis
Jul 2012
#55