Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

meow2u3

(25,250 posts)

2. It's a behind-Obama's-back channel

Reply to maxrandb (Original post)

Tue May 30, 2017, 11:17 PM

May 2017

That's what that sneak channel was intended to do--go behind Obama's back to commit espionage, treason, sedition, or whatever other crime you can think of.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hey Media! It's not a frickin "Back Channel"! [View all] maxrandb May 2017 OP

WHEN DID JARED GET ELECTED? pansypoo53219 May 2017 #1

It's a behind-Obama's-back channel meow2u3 May 2017 #2

I agree...knr...nt GReedDiamond May 2017 #3

Traitorous behavior. nt oasis May 2017 #4

Malcom Nance is right TomSlick May 2017 #5

Explaining on Brian Williams TomSlick May 2017 #6

Brian Williams has a job back? pangaia May 2017 #7

Yes maxrandb May 2017 #9

I understand that DUers don't like Williams TomSlick May 2017 #13

Been saying that for a week. TeamPooka May 2017 #8

Thanks, I've been screaming that everytime I hear the MSM say "back channel" KewlKat May 2017 #10

Yep normalizing/whitewashing treason. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #11

Thank you. Someone needs to confront the apologists calling it a back channel. Vinca May 2017 #12